[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] sparc64: fix mmu context at trap levels abo
From: |
Artyom Tarasenko |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] sparc64: fix mmu context at trap levels above zero |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:25:44 +0200 |
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko
<address@hidden> wrote:
> --- a/target-sparc/helper.c
> +++ b/target-sparc/helper.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,23 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPUState *env,
> target_phys_addr_t *physical,
> /* ??? We treat everything as a small page, then explicitly flush
> everything when an entry is evicted. */
> *page_size = TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> +#if defined (DEBUG_MMU)
> + /* safety net to catch wrong softmmu index use from dynamic code */
What does "wrong softmmu index" mean? Is it an error or an indication
that something is not implemented?
I'm hitting this net with the following message:
get_physical_address DATA tl=1 mmu_idx=2 primary context=0 secondary
context=0 address=fffb5f40
> + if (env->tl > 0 && mmu_idx != MMU_NUCLEUS_IDX) {
> + DPRINTF_MMU("get_physical_address %s tl=%d mmu_idx=%d"
> + " primary context=%" PRIx64
> + " secondary context=%" PRIx64
> + " address=%" PRIx64
> + "\n",
> + (rw == 2 ? "CODE" : "DATA"),
> + env->tl, mmu_idx,
> + env->dmmu.mmu_primary_context,
> + env->dmmu.mmu_secondary_context,
> + address);
> + }
> +#endif
Artyom
--
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko
solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] sparc64: fix mmu context at trap levels above zero,
Artyom Tarasenko <=