[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Breaking out virtfs as a standalone server?
From: |
Venkateswararao Jujjuri |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Breaking out virtfs as a standalone server? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:28:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
On 04/11/2011 06:42 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
Right now, there's no decent userspace server for the 9p filesystem that
I can find. (In part because the 9P2000.L spec is an undocumented work
in progress.)
This statement is true for 9P2000.L protocol;
But for older protocols we have standalone servers like spfs/npfs.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/npfs/
http://9p.cat-v.org/implementations
The only up-to-date server seems to be virtfs in qemu, which has no TCP
transport layer.
Are there any plans to:
A) Add a TCP transport layer so we can test with something we can
intercept/examine/log/redirect with netcat and such?
No plans as of now; I know folks in the Latchesar Ionkov attempted char
dev transport.
Not sure the latest though.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=AANLkTim4eZttAmaNQfOuM1h7cmLvO-osckHNunMvG7o%2B%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=v9fs-developer
B) Break the 9p server out so it could be built as a standalone
userspace program?
No plans yet..and I think this is a bigger discussion.
Being part of QEMU brings few implicit advantages like simplicity in
sharing, security
and performance advantage. I think taking it out can have its own merits.
If there is enough interest I am sure these two are something we can
look at as a community.
- JV
Rob