|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Import Linux headers for KVM and vhost |
Date: | Tue, 03 May 2011 12:59:06 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110419 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
On 05/03/2011 12:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-05-03 19:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:On 05/03/2011 12:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:On 3 May 2011 17:48, Jan Kiszka<address@hidden> wrote:Kernel headers were automatically imported from current kvm.git, 93c016c8c4. Some are not covered by any license and can be considered GPLv2 with user space exception.Hmm. Can't we just get whoever owns those files to apply a suitable copyright and license header to them? Committing files to qemu.git which don't have a clear (and clearly stated) copyright/license seems like a bad plan to me...Which are the headers in question?include/asm-powerpc: explicit GPLv2 include/asm-s390: explicit GPLv2 include/asm/x86: no license mentioned include/linux/kvm*: no license mentioned include/linux/vhost: no license mentioned
Michael/Avi, can ya'll add copyrights/licenses as appropriate?
include/linux/virtio*: "BSB" The last group already popped up here during a license clearing of the kernel. I contacted Rusty on them and got the answer "Standard 3 clause. The 4 clause is incompatible with the GPL." That was OK for our purposes, but I nevertheless asked Rusty to push a clarifying sentence to the kernel - unfortunately this did not happen so far.
Rusty, do you want to put together a patch with the full license or should I?
Regards, Anthony Liguori
Jan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |