qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1] Add declarations for hierarchical memory regio


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1] Add declarations for hierarchical memory region API
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 15:18:02 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 05/22/2011 03:06 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Avi Kivity<address@hidden>  wrote:
>  On 05/22/2011 12:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>>  >>    >      +void memory_region_add_coalescing(MemoryRegion *mr,
>>  >>    >      +                                  target_phys_addr_t offset,
>>  >>    >      +                                  target_phys_addr_t size);
>>  >>    >      +/* Disable MMIO coalescing for the region. */
>>  >>    >      +void memory_region_clear_coalescing(MemoryRegion *mr);
>>  >>
>>  >>    Perhaps the interface could be more generic, like
>>  >>    +void memory_region_set_property(MemoryRegion *mr, unsigned flags);
>>  >>    +void memory_region_clear_property(MemoryRegion *mr, unsigned flags);
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  >    Coalescing is a complex property, not just a boolean attribute.  We
>>  >  probably
>>  >    will have a number of boolean attributes later, though.
>>
>>  But what is the difference between adding coalescing to an area and
>>  setting the bit property 'coalescing' to an area? At least what you
>>  propose now is not so complex that it couldn't be handled as a single
>>  bit.
>
>  Look at the API - add_coalescing() sets the coalescing property on a
>  subrange of the memory region, not the entire region.

Right, but doesn't the same apply to any other properties, they may
apply to a full range or just a subrange?

We'll know when we have more properties.  I expect most will be region-wide.


>
>  Subregions are first-class regions.  In fact all regions are subregions
>  except the root.

Oh, I see now. Maybe the comments should describe this. Or perhaps the
terms should be something like 'bus/bridge/root' and 'region' instead
of 'region' and 'subregion'?

Problem is, memory_region_add_subregion() adds both sub-bridges and leaf regions.

It's quite possible that BAR 0 will be a leaf region, and BAR 1 will be a sub-bridge.

Can you suggest an alternative naming for the API?


>  It's a tree of regions, each level adding an offset, clipping, and perhaps
>  other attributes, with the leaves providing actual memory (mmio or RAM).

I thought that there are two classes of regions, like PCI device vs. a
single BAR.

It's true in a way, except the mapping is not 1:1.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]