qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:47:31 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

Amit Shah <address@hidden> writes:

> On (Thu) 16 Jun 2011 [13:38:49], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> If I start qemu with:
>> 
>>  # qemu -hda disks/test.img -enable-kvm -m 1G -snapshot \
>>         -device virtio-serial \
>>         -chardev socket,host=localhost,port=1234,server,nowait,id=foo \
>>         -device virtserialport,chardev=foo,name=org.qemu.guest_agent
>> 
>> I get a segfault when booting a Fedora 14 guest. The backtrace says:
>>
>>   Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>>   #0  0x0000000000420850 in handle_control_message (vser=0x3732bd0, 
>> buf=0x2c173e0, len=8) at 
>> /home/lcapitulino/src/qmp-unstable/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c:335
>>   335     info = DO_UPCAST(VirtIOSerialPortInfo, qdev, port->dev.info);
>
> Strange, I've not seen it so far in my testing (neither in the daily
> test runs of the virtio-serial testsuite).
>
>> I've also bisected this and git points out to commit:
>> 
>>   commit a15bb0d6a981de749452a5180fc8084d625671da
>>   Author: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>>   Date:   Wed May 25 14:21:13 2011 +0200
>> 
>>       virtio-serial: Drop redundant VirtIOSerialPort member info
>> 
>> I think what's happening is that the device is not initialized on a
>> VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY event.

Really?

I believe the device is initialized just fine, but the message refers to
a nonexistant port.  The check after find_port_by_id() suggests that's
expected for VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY.

>>                                    Moving the DO_UPCAST() call to
>> the other events fixes the problem to me.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/virtio-serial-bus.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> index 9a12104..579f676 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> @@ -332,8 +332,6 @@ static void handle_control_message(VirtIOSerial *vser, 
>> void *buf, size_t len)
>>      if (!port && cpkt.event != VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY)
>>          return;
>>  
>> -    info = DO_UPCAST(VirtIOSerialPortInfo, qdev, port->dev.info);
>> -
>
> Ah - this missed the !port check.  It should be possible to do this in
> a 'if (port)' block instead of replicating in the individual case
> statements.

You might have to do something like info = port ? DO_UPCAST(...) : NULL
to avoid warnings about info used uninitialized.

[...]



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]