|
From: | address@hidden |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU timing requirements |
Date: | Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:49:26 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 06/26/2011 06:49 AM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Yes I care. But the bug was not in Qemu. It was an integer underflow caused by a race condition. The behavior of the bug just seemed to be a problem with Qemu timers but it is not. So I thought it doesn't make much sense to share a bug in my code with the list...On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 05:29, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:Think I found the problem. It was a bug in my code and because of some weird circumstances, backtrace and addresses seemed to be a segfault in a BBL.glad you find it..... care to share to everyone what's really goin' on? who knows it will reveal somekind of hidden problem in Qemu/TCG....
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |