qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 00/20] Memory API


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 00/20] Memory API
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:44:19 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 06/27/2011 06:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/27/2011 08:21 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
As expected, this is taking longer than expected, so I'm releasing something
less complete than I'd have liked.  Not even all of the PC machine is
converted, but the difficult parts are (cirrus). It appears to work well.

The major change compared to v1 is the introduction of
memory_region_init_alias(), which defines a memory region in terms of another. With the current API, the ability to alias is provided by address arithmetic
on ram_addr_t:

   ram_addr = qemu_ram_alloc(...);
   cpu_register_physical_memory(..., ram_addr, size, ...);
   /* alias: */
cpu_register_physical_memory(..., ram_addr + offset, another_size, ...);

With the new API, you have to create an alias:

   memory_region_init_ram(&mem, ...);
   memory_region_register_subregion(...,&mem);
   /* alias: */
   memory_region_init_alias(&alias, ...,&mem, offset, another_size);
   memory_region_register_subregion(...,&alias);

What's the rationale for explicit aliasing verses registering the same region to two different address spaces?

Two:

- an alias is usually just a portion of the original region (vga windows; the two main RAM sections below and above 4GB); so we need an object to hold the differences - easier for the implementation (a MemoryRegion object can be in just one child list instead of many)

While I can work around the implementation difficulties, there's no point since the alias is usually not identical to the origin, so we need a new object anyway.

(ram_addr_t works around that by carrying the offset in the handle, and letting the caller carry the size).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]