qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] virtio-serial: Clean up virtser_bus_dev_pri


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] virtio-serial: Clean up virtser_bus_dev_print() output
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:32:57 +0200

Am 19.05.2011 um 16:18 schrieb Markus Armbruster:

Amit Shah <address@hidden> writes:

On (Thu) 19 May 2011 [13:37:15], Markus Armbruster wrote:
Old version looks like this in info qtree (last four lines):

         dev: virtconsole, id ""
           dev-prop: is_console = 1
           dev-prop: nr = 0
           dev-prop: chardev = <null>
           dev-prop: name = <null>
            dev-prop-int: id: 0
            dev-prop-int: guest_connected: 1
            dev-prop-int: host_connected: 0
            dev-prop-int: throttled: 0

Indentation is off, and "dev-prop-int" suggests these are properties
you can configure with -device, which isn't the case.  The other
buses' print_dev() callbacks don't do that.  For instance, PCI's
output looks like this:

class Ethernet controller, addr 00:03.0, pci id 1af4:1000 (sub 1af4:0001)
       bar 0: i/o at 0xffffffffffffffff [0x1e]
       bar 1: mem at 0xffffffffffffffff [0xffe]
       bar 6: mem at 0xffffffffffffffff [0xfffe]

Change virtser_bus_dev_print() to that style.  Result:

         dev: virtconsole, id ""
           dev-prop: is_console = 1
           dev-prop: nr = 0
           dev-prop: chardev = <null>
           dev-prop: name = <null>
           port 0, guest on, host off, throttle off

Here the original guest_connected and host_connected meant whether the
endpoints were open.  guest on/off, host on/off don't convey that
meaning.  Can't think of a short version, can you?

I chose on/off to stay consistent with how qdev shows bool properties
(print_bit() in qdev-properties.c).  May be misguided.  Like you, I'm
having difficulties coming up with a better version that is still
consise.

Erm, I'm not aware that my qdev bool patch got committed yet, so the question of how to parse/print bool properties (on/off vs. yes/no) is still undecided, no comments so far. It would be entirely possible to let the author decide that on a case-by-case basis by using different property type enums for the same 'bool' type.

Andreas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]