qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] A few cleanups of qdev users


From: Amit Shah
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] A few cleanups of qdev users
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:04:27 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On (Tue) 28 Jun 2011 [14:24:32], Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Amit Shah <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On (Mon) 27 Jun 2011 [14:36:11], Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Amit Shah <address@hidden> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On (Fri) 24 Jun 2011 [13:57:28], Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> Ping?
> >> >
> >> > There were a couple of things:
> >> >
> >> >>             port 0, guest on, host off, throttle off
> >> >
> >> > guest on/off, host on/off doesn't convey much -- what's on/off?
> >> >
> >> > Also, 'throttle' could be 'thottled'?
> >> 
> >> Discussion petered out with my message[*]:
> >> 
> >>     I chose on/off to stay consistent with how qdev shows bool
> >>     properties (print_bit() in qdev-properties.c).  May be misguided.
> >>     Like you, I'm having difficulties coming up with a better version
> >>     that is still consise.
> >>     
> >>     But: should "info qtree" show such device state?  It's about
> >>     configuration of the device tree, isn't it?  Connection status is
> >>     useful to know, but it's not device configuration.  Other
> >>     print_dev() methods may cross that line, too.  For instance,
> >>     usb_bus_dev_print() prints attached, which looks suspicious (commit
> >>     66a6593a).
> >> 
> >> Should info qtree continue to show this information?  If yes, care to
> >> suggest a better format?
> >
> > Don't know.  I'm fine with anything the qdev guys decide.  I agree
> > this isn't device state.
> 
> Unfortunately, there's no qdev maintainer making descisions.

I think Gerd and you can make those decisions? :-)

> What shall we do now?
> 
> 1. Commit as is.  Need an ACK then.
> 
> 2. Respin with virtser_bus_dev_print() printing the same stuff prettier.
> Need ideas on a prettier format.
> 
> 3. Respin with virtser_bus_dev_print() printing less stuff, but
> prettier.  Need ideas on what exactly to print, and how.

Frankly, I've no clue.  I can only suggest some better names, but
since these values are debug values, and there's not much churn
happening in the code, I could go with anything you people suggest.
I'm open to slightly renamed strings going in, open to reworking
things, etc..

How about:

    port 0, guest_con on, host_con off, throttled off

?


                Amit



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]