qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] megasas: LSI Megaraid SAS emulation


From: Hannes Reinecke
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] megasas: LSI Megaraid SAS emulation
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:50:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 SUSE/3.1.10 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 07/01/2011 06:42 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:

On 01.07.2011, at 17:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

This patch adds an emulation for the LSI Megaraid SAS 8708EM2 HBA.

Have you tried to execute the current version of megasas and actually
> do something with it? I just booted up openSUSE 11.4 rescue from DVD
> with a megasas adapter that contained a raw file backed by tmpfs.
> Creating a partition worked fine, but when running mkfs.ext3 and
> mounting afterwards, the mount fails saying there is no ext3 on the disk.

Sounds like data corruption to me :). I know that this used to work
> a while back, so it might be a regression recently?

It worked here, in the sense that I've booted up an existing openSUSE 11.4 installation. But I wouldn't be surprised if the degradation to use bounce-buffers has some flaws.

My guess here is that we have problems when the transfersizes larger as the internal bounce buffer.

(I probably should be putting in some more references to 'bounce buffers' here to alert people that using bounce buffers in SCSI is the best way of killing performance)
(And no, I will not getting into another dog-fight with Paul B. here.
Virtio can do without bounce buffers. AHCI can. So I fail to see why SCSI has to rely on bounce buffers.)

But enough of this, Yeah, bugfixing is needed here. I see what I can do.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                   zSeries & Storage
address@hidden                        +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]