qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] megasas: LSI Megaraid SAS emulation


From: Hannes Reinecke
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] megasas: LSI Megaraid SAS emulation
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:26:42 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Thunderbird/3.1.8

On 07/04/2011 08:34 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/04/2011 08:13 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 07/03/2011 04:36 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/02/2011 03:50 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
(And no, I will not getting into another dog-fight with Paul B.
here.
Virtio can do without bounce buffers. AHCI can. So I fail to see
why
SCSI has to rely on bounce buffers.)

I agree, but I do see why a SCSI device might prefer to rely on
bounce buffers for non-I/O commands. This is why in my last RFC
series for vmw_pvscsi I let the device choose whether to force a
bounce buffer or get an external iovec from the HBA.

Yes, sure, for non-I/O commands it's perfectly okay.
Most of which will be emulated anyway.
It's bounce buffers for I/O which kills performance.

But I seem to have missed your last RFC (I'm not reading
qemu-devel on a
regular basis ...).
Care to send me a pointer to it?

Sure,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-06/msg00668.html

Cool.
Exactly what I need.

FWIW, feel free to add my 'Acked-by' to it.

Any chance of getting them included?

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                   zSeries & Storage
address@hidden                        +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]