qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] [PowerPC][RFC] booke timers


From: Fabien Chouteau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] [PowerPC][RFC] booke timers
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:06:54 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 01/07/2011 22:22, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 16:13:41 +0200
> Fabien Chouteau <address@hidden> wrote:
>> +static void booke_update_fixed_timer(CPUState         *env,
>> +                                     uint8_t           target_bit,
>> +                                     uint64_t          *next,
>> +                                     struct QEMUTimer *timer)
>> +{
>> +    ppc_tb_t *tb_env = env->tb_env;
>> +    uint64_t lapse;
>> +    uint64_t tb;
>> +    uint64_t period = 1 << (target_bit + 1);
>> +    uint64_t now;
>> +
>> +    now = qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock);
>> +    tb  = cpu_ppc_get_tb(tb_env, now, tb_env->tb_offset);
>> +
>> +    if (tb <= (1 << target_bit)) {
>> +        lapse = (1 << target_bit) - tb;
>> +    } else {
>> +        lapse = period - ((tb - (1 << target_bit)) % period);
> 
> We know period is a power of two, so just do "& (period - 1)".
> 
> That should let you get rid of the special case for
> "tb <= (1 << target_bit)" as well.
> 

Do you mean "lapse = period - ((tb - (1 << target_bit)) & (period - 1));" ?

I don't see how this solves the "tb <= (1 << target_bit)" case.

-- 
Fabien Chouteau



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]