qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] balloon: Separate out stat and balloon hand


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] balloon: Separate out stat and balloon handling
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:11:27 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

Amit Shah <address@hidden> writes:

> On (Fri) 22 Jul 2011 [16:45:55], Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Amit Shah <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > Passing on '0' as ballooning target to indicate retrieval of stats is
>> > bad API.  It also makes 'balloon 0' in the monitor cause a segfault.
>> > Have two different functions handle the different functionality instead.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Mike Cao <address@hidden>
>> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <address@hidden>
>> 
>> Can you explain the fault?  It's not obvious to me...
>
> There's a bt at:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694378
>
> The callback is populated when called via 'info balloon', where some
> detail is printed on the monitor after the guest responds with the
> current balloon info.

Which callback?  There are a few...

> On the other hand, 'balloon X' just updates the balloon size; with no
> information to be printed.  When 'balloon 0' is issued,
> virtio_balloon_to_target() thinks it is the 'info balloon' command,
> gets info from the guest, and then tries to call the monitor callback
> to print the info it got... and segfaults.

I still don't get it.

Okay, back from the debugger; here's what happens.

1. do_info_balloon() is an info_async() method.  It receives a callback
   with argument, to be called exactly once (callback frees the
   argument).  It passes the callback via qemu_balloon_status() and
   indirectly through qemu_balloon_event to virtio_balloon_to_target().

   virtio_balloon_to_target() executes its balloon stats half.  It
   stores the callback in the device state.

   If it can't send a stats request, it resets stats and calls the
   callback right away.

   Else, it sends a stats request.  The device model runs the callback
   when it receives the answer.

   Works.

2. do_balloon() is a cmd_async() method.  It receives a callback with
   argument, to be called when the command completes.  do_balloon()
   calls it right before it succeeds.  Odd, but should work.

   Nevertheless, it passes the callback on via qemu_ballon() and
   indirectly through qemu_balloon_event to virtio_balloon_to_target().

   a. If the argument is non-zero, virtio_balloon_to_target() executes
      its balloon half, which doesn't use the callback in any way.

      Odd, but works.

   b. If the argument is zero, virtio_balloon_to_target() executes its
      balloon stats half, just like in 1.  It either calls the callback
      right away, or arranges for it to be called later.

      Thus, the callback runs twice: use after free and double free.

Test case: start with -S -device virtio-balloon, execute "balloon 0" in
human monitor.  Runs the callback first from virtio_balloon_to_target(),
then again from do_balloon().

>> > --- a/hw/virtio-balloon.c
>> > +++ b/hw/virtio-balloon.c
>> > @@ -227,8 +227,7 @@ static void virtio_balloon_stat(void *opaque, 
>> > MonitorCompletion cb,
>> >      complete_stats_request(dev);
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > -static void virtio_balloon_to_target(void *opaque, ram_addr_t target,
>> > -                                     MonitorCompletion cb, void *cb_data)
>> > +static void virtio_balloon_to_target(void *opaque, ram_addr_t target)
>> >  {
>> >      VirtIOBalloon *dev = opaque;
>> >  
>> > @@ -238,8 +237,6 @@ static void virtio_balloon_to_target(void *opaque, 
>> > ram_addr_t target,
>> >      if (target) {
>> >          dev->num_pages = (ram_size - target) >> VIRTIO_BALLOON_PFN_SHIFT;
>> >          virtio_notify_config(&dev->vdev);
>> > -    } else {
>> > -        virtio_balloon_stat(opaque, cb, cb_data);
>> >      }
>> >  }
>> >  
>> 
>> Special case: do nothing when target == 0.  Is that necessary/
>
> Why make a round trip to the guest when we're doing nothing?

Smells like unwarranted optimization of an uncommon case to me.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]