qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] The intro for QEMU disk I/O limits


From: Ryan Harper
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] The intro for QEMU disk I/O limits
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:09:03 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

* Zhi Yong Wu <address@hidden> [2011-07-28 05:53]:
> The main goal of the patch is to effectively cap the disk I/O speed or counts 
> of one single VM.It is only one draft, so it unavoidably has some drawbacks, 
> if you catch them, please let me know.
> 
> The patch will mainly introduce one block I/O throttling algorithm, one timer 
> and one block queue for each I/O limits enabled drive.
> 
> When a block request is coming in, the throttling algorithm will check if its 
> I/O rate or counts exceed the limits; if yes, then it will enqueue to the 
> block queue; The timer will periodically handle the I/O requests in it.
> 
> Some available features follow as below:
> (1) global bps limit.
>     -drive bps=xxx            in bytes/s
> (2) only read bps limit
>     -drive bps_rd=xxx         in bytes/s
> (3) only write bps limit
>     -drive bps_wr=xxx         in bytes/s
> (4) global iops limit
>     -drive iops=xxx           in ios/s
> (5) only read iops limit
>     -drive iops_rd=xxx        in ios/s
> (6) only write iops limit
>     -drive iops_wr=xxx        in ios/s
> (7) the combination of some limits.
>     -drive bps=xxx,iops=xxx
> 
> Known Limitations:
> (1) #1 can not coexist with #2, #3
> (2) #4 can not coexist with #5, #6
> (3) When bps/iops limits are specified to a small value such as 511 bytes/s, 
> this VM will hang up. We are considering how to handle this senario.
> 

I don't yet have detailed info , but we've got a memory leak in the
code.  After running the VM with a 1MB r and w limit for 8 hours or
so:

-drive bps_rd=$((1*1024*1024)),bps_wr=$((1*1024*1024))

I've got my system swapping with 43G resident in memory:

9913 root      20   0 87.3g  43g  548 D  9.6 34.5  44:00.87 qemu-system-x86


would be worth looking through the code and maybe a valgrind run to
catch the leak.


-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]