qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/16] scsi-disk: no need to call scsi_req_data


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/16] scsi-disk: no need to call scsi_req_data on a short read
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:46:42 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0

Am 04.08.2011 15:35, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> In fact, if the HBA's transfer_data callback goes on with scsi_req_continue
>> the request will be completed successfully instead of showing a failure.
>> It can even cause a segmentation fault.
>>
>> An easy way to trigger it is "eject -f cd" during installation (during media
>> test if the installer does something like that).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/scsi-disk.c |    3 ---
>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> index f42a5d1..814bf74 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> @@ -217,9 +217,6 @@ static int scsi_handle_rw_error(SCSIDiskReq *r, int 
>> error, int type)
>>         bdrv_mon_event(s->bs, BDRV_ACTION_STOP, is_read);
>>         vm_stop(VMSTOP_DISKFULL);
>>     } else {
>> -        if (type == SCSI_REQ_STATUS_RETRY_READ) {
>> -            scsi_req_data(&r->req, 0);
>> -        }
>>         switch (error) {
>>         case ENOMEM:
>>             scsi_command_complete(r, CHECK_CONDITION,
> 
> Kevin, do you remember why you added this in 5dba48a8?

No, I don't remember anything specific, I just tried to leave the
rerror=report case unchanged. This looks like it's moved code from
scsi_read_complete.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]