Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Planning for 1.0 (and freezing the master branch)

[Anthony Liguori]

On 08/14/2011 02:30 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:>> Maybe something more like:
> > 2 months development
> > -rc0 goes out (master enters soft feature freeze)
>
> Why an rc0 at this point? 0.15-rc0 was in a bad shape because it was
> forked just after heavy development (ga etc).

It could be called -beta1 instead of -rc0.  We just need to tag it with 
something.

> I'd nominate release
> candidates only after soft freeze, then there would not be any major
> changes. Though a rc0 could attract testing efforts from outside and
> for those, the earlier the better.
>
> > 2 weeks development in master, stabilization and careful consideration of
> > new features
> > -rc1 goes out (master enters hard feature freeze)
> > 1 week stabilization
> > -rc2 goes out
> > 1 week stabilization
> > -rc3 goes out, -rc3 becomes release
>
> So at this point master would be released? What's the difference in
> time between rc3 and release?

Ideally, nothing.  Having an -rc3 is just a conservative mechanism to 
make sure that there is an absolute final call for testing before teh 
release.

> Overall this would only give a duty cycle of 67%. For 4 weeks total
> freeze, the development would need to be 4 months for an 80% duty
> cycle. But I think this version could work too.

Yeah, that's more or less what I'm proposing for 1.0 :-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> > I think a shorter cycle could work better long term.  I think it needs to be
> > done as part of the master branch though and I'd wait until 1.1 to implement
> > it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Anthony Liguori