[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions
From: |
Rob Landley |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:23:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
On 08/21/2011 05:04 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le samedi 20 août 2011 à 18:42 -0500, Rob Landley a écrit :
>> On 08/20/2011 06:17 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote:
>>>> or ancient macintosh support
>>>
>>> Most of the hardware (but a few required ones like SWIM) is already
>>> in QEMU, you need to glue everything, make Toolbox be VERY happy
>>> about its environment, make Mac OS boot so it can second-boot Linux
>>> (the direct-booter is so buggy it may introduce phantom bugs on the
>>> emulation) and implement the MMU.
>>
>> I haven't got a copy of ancient MacOS.
>>
>> Why is the direct booter buggy? I'm happy to track down and isolate
>> phantom bugs, either in the kernel or in qemu. (One nice thing about
>> emulators is you can get deterministic regression tests reasonably
>> easily. :)
>>
>> How do I _use_ the direct booter, anyway? I built mac_defconfig in 3.0
>> but it only gave me a vmlinux, which faulted on the instruction at
>> address 0. I tried m68k-objdump -O binary vmlinux vmlinux.bin but that
>> wouldnt' bot at all (qemu -kernel refused to load it).
>
> For the moment, q800 is not working.
I noticed. :)
> Master branch is for m68k-linux-user target.
>
> I'm working on m68k-softmmu on the macrom-branch by porting the
> basiliskII stuff.
That doesn't emulate real hardware according to the introduction of
http://basilisk.cebix.net/TECH so what is there to port? (Closer CPU
emulation for the MMU stuff?)
> but a ROM will not be required to boot it as the bootloader has the role
> to collect information from the ROM to pass it the kernel.
> Qemu will be able to do it and boot directly the kernel (with option
> --kernel). We can cut&paste parts from the EMILE bootloader.
If the platform wasn't mummified I'd suggest a device tree conversion... :)
> A real machine emulation will require a ROM. But for this part we can
> have a look to executore (https://github.com/ctm/executor).
I just want to run Linux on the thing, via -kernel and -append.
Rob
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Natalia Portillo, 2011/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Rob Landley, 2011/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Natalia Portillo, 2011/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Rob Landley, 2011/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Natalia Portillo, 2011/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Rob Landley, 2011/08/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Natalia Portillo, 2011/08/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Rob Landley, 2011/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Laurent Vivier, 2011/08/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions, Natalia Portillo, 2011/08/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions,
Rob Landley <=