qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] lsi53c895a: avoid a warning from clang anal


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] lsi53c895a: avoid a warning from clang analyzer
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:20:24 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0

On 09/04/2011 06:53 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
Avoid this warning from clang analyzer by adjusting the scope
of the variable:
/src/qemu/hw/lsi53c895a.c:895:5: warning: Value stored to 'id' is never read
     id = (current_tag>>  8)&  0xf;

Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl<address@hidden>
---
  hw/lsi53c895a.c |   14 ++++++++------
  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/lsi53c895a.c b/hw/lsi53c895a.c
index 1643a63..9d900d0 100644
--- a/hw/lsi53c895a.c
+++ b/hw/lsi53c895a.c
@@ -883,7 +883,6 @@ static void lsi_do_msgout(LSIState *s)
      int len;
      uint32_t current_tag;
      lsi_request *current_req, *p, *p_next;
-    int id;

      if (s->current) {
          current_tag = s->current->tag;
@@ -892,7 +891,6 @@ static void lsi_do_msgout(LSIState *s)
          current_tag = s->select_tag;
          current_req = lsi_find_by_tag(s, current_tag);
      }
-    id = (current_tag>>  8)&  0xf;

      DPRINTF("MSG out len=%d\n", s->dbc);
      while (s->dbc) {
@@ -977,10 +975,14 @@ static void lsi_do_msgout(LSIState *s)
                 device, but this is currently not implemented (and seems not
                 to be really necessary). So let's simply clear all queued
                 commands for the current device: */
-            id = current_tag&  0x0000ff00;
-            QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(p,&s->queue, next, p_next) {
-                if ((p->tag&  0x0000ff00) == id) {
-                    scsi_req_cancel(p->req);
+            {
+                int id;
+
+                id = current_tag&  0x0000ff00;
+                QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(p,&s->queue, next, p_next) {
+                    if ((p->tag&  0x0000ff00) == id) {
+                        scsi_req_cancel(p->req);
+                    }
                  }
              }


Why not keep id declared in the outer scope? This extra indentation is annoying.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]