qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ahci: Remove unused struct member


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ahci: Remove unused struct member
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:43:38 +0200

On 09.09.2011, at 11:15, Kevin Wolf wrote:

> Am 08.09.2011 21:44, schrieb Stefan Weil:
>> Member variable is_read is written, but never read
>> (contrary to its name).
> 
> Nice commit message :-)
> 
>> Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/ide/ahci.c |    2 --
>> hw/ide/ahci.h |    1 -
>> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/ide/ahci.c b/hw/ide/ahci.c
>> index f4fa154..a8659cf 100644
>> --- a/hw/ide/ahci.c
>> +++ b/hw/ide/ahci.c
>> @@ -754,7 +754,6 @@ static void process_ncq_command(AHCIState *s, int port, 
>> uint8_t *cmd_fis,
>>         case READ_FPDMA_QUEUED:
>>             DPRINTF(port, "NCQ reading %d sectors from LBA %ld, tag %d\n",
>>                     ncq_tfs->sector_count-1, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
>> -            ncq_tfs->is_read = 1;
>> 
>>             DPRINTF(port, "tag %d aio read %ld\n", ncq_tfs->tag, 
>> ncq_tfs->lba);
>> 
>> @@ -768,7 +767,6 @@ static void process_ncq_command(AHCIState *s, int port, 
>> uint8_t *cmd_fis,
>>         case WRITE_FPDMA_QUEUED:
>>             DPRINTF(port, "NCQ writing %d sectors to LBA %ld, tag %d\n",
>>                     ncq_tfs->sector_count-1, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
>> -            ncq_tfs->is_read = 0;
>> 
>>             DPRINTF(port, "tag %d aio write %ld\n", ncq_tfs->tag, 
>> ncq_tfs->lba);
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/ide/ahci.h b/hw/ide/ahci.h
>> index 3c29d93..5de986c 100644
>> --- a/hw/ide/ahci.h
>> +++ b/hw/ide/ahci.h
>> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ typedef struct NCQTransferState {
>>     BlockDriverAIOCB *aiocb;
>>     QEMUSGList sglist;
>>     BlockAcctCookie acct;
>> -    int is_read;
>>     uint16_t sector_count;
>>     uint64_t lba;
>>     uint8_t tag;
> 
> Alex, any specific reason you introduced it for? Is it unnecessary or is
> it a bug that it has no user?

This is a leftover from before the code went upstream. It can easily go away :)


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]