qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for October 25


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for October 25
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:41:52 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1

On 10/26/2011 10:48 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Sector size is a device property.

If the user asks for a 4K sector disk, and the backend can't support
that, we need to reject the configuration.  Just like we reject
read-only backends for read/write disks.

Isn't it the other way round, i.e. the user asks for a 512-byte sector disk (i.e. the default) with cache=none but the disk has 4k sectors? We're basically saying "choose between NFS and migration if you have 4k sector disks but your guest doesn't support them". Understandable perhaps, but not exactly kind, and virtualization is also about shielding from this kind of hardware dependency even at the cost of performance. QEMU should just warn about performance degradations, erroring out would be a policy decision that should be up to management.

It's okay to default device properties to some backend-dependent value,
if that improves usability.

On the other hand, not all guests support 4k-sectors properly.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]