qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm_init didn't set return value after create v


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm_init didn't set return value after create vm failed
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:03:47 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2011-10-26 12:19, Xu He Jie wrote:
> kvm_init didn't set return value after create vm failed.
> 
> And kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VM, 0)'s return value can be < -1, 
> so change the check of vmfd at label 'err'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xu He Jie <address@hidden>
> ---
>  kvm-all.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index e7faf5c..70edb39 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,7 @@ int kvm_init(void)
>          fprintf(stderr, "Please add the 'switch_amode' kernel parameter to "
>                          "your host kernel command line\n");
>  #endif
> +        ret = -errno;

kvm_ioctl returns -errno while that fprintf may overwrite it. Just set
ret to s->vmfd.

>          goto err;
>      }
>  
> @@ -797,7 +798,7 @@ int kvm_init(void)
>  
>  err:
>      if (s) {
> -        if (s->vmfd != -1) {
> +        if (s->vmfd >= 0) {
>              close(s->vmfd);
>          }
>          if (s->fd != -1) {

That looks correct.

The patch will probably flow via uq/master, so you should address Avi
and Marcelo with v2.

Thanks,
Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]