[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm_init didn't set return value after create v
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm_init didn't set return value after create vm failed |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:03:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 2011-10-26 12:19, Xu He Jie wrote:
> kvm_init didn't set return value after create vm failed.
>
> And kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VM, 0)'s return value can be < -1,
> so change the check of vmfd at label 'err'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu He Jie <address@hidden>
> ---
> kvm-all.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index e7faf5c..70edb39 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,7 @@ int kvm_init(void)
> fprintf(stderr, "Please add the 'switch_amode' kernel parameter to "
> "your host kernel command line\n");
> #endif
> + ret = -errno;
kvm_ioctl returns -errno while that fprintf may overwrite it. Just set
ret to s->vmfd.
> goto err;
> }
>
> @@ -797,7 +798,7 @@ int kvm_init(void)
>
> err:
> if (s) {
> - if (s->vmfd != -1) {
> + if (s->vmfd >= 0) {
> close(s->vmfd);
> }
> if (s->fd != -1) {
That looks correct.
The patch will probably flow via uq/master, so you should address Avi
and Marcelo with v2.
Thanks,
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux