qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 824650] [NEW] Latest GIT assert error in arp_table


From: Roy Tam
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 824650] [NEW] Latest GIT assert error in arp_table.c
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:21:23 +0800

2011/10/27 Roy Tam <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/10/26 Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>:
>> On 2011-10-26 10:03, Roy Tam wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2011/9/15 Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>:
>>>> On 2011-09-15 15:20, Roy Tam wrote:
>>>>> 2011/9/15 Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>:
>>>>>> On 2011-09-15 14:05, Roy Tam wrote:
>>>>>>> Here you go.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sb16: warning: command 0xf,1 is not truly understood yet
>>>>>>> sb16: warning: command 0xe,2 is not truly understood yet
>>>>>>> [Switching to Thread 13840.0x3140]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Breakpoint 1, arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=4294967295,
>>>>>>>     out_ethaddr=0x20af64a "") at slirp/arp_table.c:75
>>>>>>> 75      //    assert((ip_addr & htonl(~(0xf << 28))) != 0);
>>>>>>> (gdb) c
>>>>>>> Continuing.
>>>>>>> [New Thread 13840.0x31b8]
>>>>>>> [Switching to Thread 13840.0x3628]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Breakpoint 1, arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=0,
>>>>>>>     out_ethaddr=0x22f642 "\"") at slirp/arp_table.c:75
>>>>>>> 75      //    assert((ip_addr & htonl(~(0xf << 28))) != 0);
>>>>>>> (gdb) bt
>>>>>>> #0  arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=0, out_ethaddr=0x22f642 
>>>>>>> "\"")
>>>>>>>     at slirp/arp_table.c:75
>>>>>>> #1  0x004bafbd in if_encap (slirp=0x19f7488, ifm=0x2255978)
>>>>>>>     at slirp/slirp.c:709
>>>>>>> #2  0x004b8a73 in if_start (slirp=0x19f7380) at slirp/if.c:210
>>>>>>> #3  0x004b9c9e in ip_output (so=0x2255978, m0=0x0) at 
>>>>>>> slirp/ip_output.c:84
>>>>>>> #4  0x004bf737 in tcp_output (tp=0x1cac848) at slirp/tcp_output.c:456
>>>>>>> #5  0x004c09ad in tcp_drop (tp=0x1cac848, err=0) at slirp/tcp_subr.c:225
>>>>>>> #6  0x004c1182 in tcp_timers (timer=<optimized out>, tp=<optimized out>)
>>>>>>>     at slirp/tcp_timer.c:287
>>>>>>> #7  tcp_slowtimo (slirp=0x0) at slirp/tcp_timer.c:88
>>>>>>> #8  0x004bb6f1 in slirp_select_poll (readfds=0x22fae0, 
>>>>>>> writefds=0x22f9dc,
>>>>>>>     xfds=0x22f8d8, select_error=2291816) at slirp/slirp.c:433
>>>>>>> #9  0x0048fb87 in main_loop_wait (nonblocking=0)
>>>>>>>     at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:1436
>>>>>>> #10 0x00490d10 in main_loop () at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:1466
>>>>>>> #11 qemu_main (argc=0, argv=0x19f5100, envp=0x0)
>>>>>>>     at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:3453
>>>>>>> #12 0x0049322d in SDL_main (argc=17, argv=0x19f5100)
>>>>>>>     at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:102
>>>>>>> #13 0x005eb784 in console_main ()
>>>>>>> #14 0x005eb844 in address@hidden ()
>>>>>>> #15 0x005eb068 in main ()
>>>>>>> (gdb) frame 4
>>>>>>> #4  0x004bf737 in tcp_output (tp=0x1cac848) at slirp/tcp_output.c:456
>>>>>>> 456             error = ip_output(so, m);
>>>>>>> (gdb) print *tp
>>>>>>> $1 = {seg_next = 0x1cac848, seg_prev = 0x1cac848, t_state = 0, t_timer 
>>>>>>> = {0,
>>>>>>>     0, 0, 0}, t_rxtshift = 0, t_rxtcur = 12, t_dupacks = 0, t_maxseg = 
>>>>>>> 1460,
>>>>>>>   t_force = 0 '\000', t_flags = 0, t_template = {ti_i = {ih_mbuf = {
>>>>>>>         mptr = 0x0, dummy = 0}, ih_x1 = 0 '\000', ih_pr = 0 '\000',
>>>>>>>       ih_len = 0, ih_src = {S_un = {S_un_b = {s_b1 = 0 '\000',
>>>>>>>             s_b2 = 0 '\000', s_b3 = 0 '\000', s_b4 = 0 '\000'}, S_un_w 
>>>>>>> = {
>>>>>>>             s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 0}}, ih_dst = {S_un = {S_un_b 
>>>>>>> = {
>>>>>>>             s_b1 = 0 '\000', s_b2 = 0 '\000', s_b3 = 0 '\000',
>>>>>>>             s_b4 = 0 '\000'}, S_un_w = {s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 
>>>>>>> 0}}},
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That confirms my theory: the template is not yet initialized.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A shot from the hips: does this patch help?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah the assertion doesn't fail anymore. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Now I just need to invent some good "why this is correct"... ;)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for testing,
>>>
>>> I just have time now to make some tests about -net user.
>>> And I found that the User mode networking doesn't work anymore after
>>> your slirp patch series.
>>
>> Can you be more verbose? What precisely does not work? Same setup as
>> before (host, guest, command line, steps to reproduce)? I'm not facing
>> problems here ATM.
>>
>
> QEMU Revision: 2011-10-12 (latest git give me an Assertion failed:
> alarm_has_dynticks(t), file qemu-timer.c, line 139. Since there is no
> change in slirp directory, it should apply to latest git)
> gcc version:$ gcc -v
> Target: mingw32
> Configured with: ../gcc-4.3.3/configure --prefix=/mingw
> --build=mingw32 --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++
> --with-bugurl=http://www.tdragon.net/recentgcc/bugs.php --disable-nls
> --disable-win32-registry --enable-libgomp --disable-werror
> --enable-threads --disable-symvers
> --enable-cxx-flags='-fno-function-sections -fno-data-sections'
> --enable-fully-dynamic-string --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
> --enable-sjlj-exceptions --with-pkgversion='4.3.3-tdm-1 mingw32'
> Thread model: win32
> gcc version 4.3.3 (4.3.3-tdm-1 mingw32)
> configure commandline: ./configure --target-list="i386-softmmu
> x86_64-softmmu mips64el-softmmu" --audio-drv-list=sdl
> --audio-card-list=ac97,sb16,adlib --disable-linux-aio
> --enable-vnc-thread --disable-vnc-jpeg --extra-ldflags=-s
> QEMU Host: Windows XP SP3
> QEMU Guest: Windows XP SP3, Linux 2.6.38 (NIC: ne2k-pci, e1000)
> commandline: qemu-system-i386 -hda xp.vmdk -soundhw sb16 -m 320
> -localtime -usb -usbdevice tablet -net user -net nic,model=ne2k_pci
>
> Symptoms:
> Guest can lease IP from QEMU Virtual DHCP Server, but the outgoing
> traffic are not working:
> - 10.0.2.3 Virtual DNS Server doesn't respond any DNS query ("nslookup
> www.google.com" fails with timeout message, "nslookup www.google.com
> <host's dns server ip>" and "nslookup www.google.com 8.8.8.8" are also
> failed)
> - 10.0.2.2 Virtual Gateway is also unable to connect, only reply
> pings. Other connections are timeout.
> - 10.0.2.4 Virtual Samba Server is also unconnectable
>
> My last worked build is 2011-9-09 build and it starts to fail since
> 2011-9-10 build.

And I'm tried on trying to build every revision. I can find the range
df00bed0fa30a6f5712456e7add783e470c534c9(ok) to
31ff5cc31b10a4a48f854d8e06090c49f92a6720(fail) only.

>
>> Thanks,
>> Jan
>>
>> --
>> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
>> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
>>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]