qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory sync algorithm during migration


From: Juan Quintela
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory sync algorithm during migration
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:31:58 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)

Oliver Hookins <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:47:58AM +0100, ext Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Takuya Yoshikawa <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Adding qemu-devel ML to CC.
>> >
>> > Your question should have been sent to qemu-devel ML because the logic
>> > is implemented in QEMU, not KVM.
>> >
>> > (2011/11/11 1:35), Oliver Hookins wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I am performing some benchmarks on KVM migration on two different types 
>> >> of VM.
>> >> One has 4GB RAM and the other 32GB. More or less idle, the 4GB VM takes 
>> >> about 20
>> >> seconds to migrate on our hardware while the 32GB VM takes about a minute.
>> >>
>> >> With a reasonable amount of memory activity going on (in the hundreds of 
>> >> MB per
>> >> second) the 32GB VM takes 3.5 minutes to migrate, but the 4GB VM never
>> >> completes. Intuitively this tells me there is some watermarking of dirty 
>> >> pages
>> >> going on that is not particularly efficient when the dirty pages ratio is 
>> >> high
>> >> compared to total memory, but I may be completely incorrect.
>> 
>> > You can change the ratio IIRC.
>> > Hopefully, someone who knows well about QEMU will tell you better ways.
>> >
>> >    Takuya
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Could anybody fill me in on what might be going on here? We're using 
>> >> libvirt
>> >> 0.8.2 and kvm-83-224.el5.centos.1
>> 
>> This is pretty old qemu/kvm code base.
>> In principle, it makes no sense that with 32GB RAM migration finishes,
>> and with 4GB RAM it is unable (intuitively it should be, if ever, the
>> other way around).
>> 
>> Do you have an easy test that makes the problem easily reproducible?
>> Have you tried ustream qemu.git? (some improvements on that department).
>
> I've just tried the qemu-kvm 0.14.1 tag which seems to be the latest that 
> builds
> on my platform. For some strange reason migrations always seem to fail in one
> direction with "Unknown savevm section or instance 'hpet' 0" messages.

What is your platform?  This seems like you are running with hpet in one
side, but without it in the other.  What command line are you using?

> This seems to point to different migration protocols on either end but they 
> are
> both running the same version of qemu-kvm I built. Does this ring any bells 
> for
> anyone?

Command line mismatch.  But, what is your platform?

Later, Juan.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]