Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] qemu-test: a set of tests scripts for QEMU

[Avi Kivity]

On 12/29/2011 11:10 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:

>
> > Even if that turns out to be the case, it's fine.  Better to
> > have a few good devices than dozens of bad ones.
>
> This is easier to say on the x86 side of the fence, since
> most of the devices you need are already in the codebase and
> nobody is going to throw them out again if tests don't get
> written for them :-)
>
> There are lots of things where I'd rather have a "tested by
> booting a guest OS" implementation than none at all (like audio
> support for the versatile/etc boards, which went in recently) or
> TrustZone support (not in yet but may be along later). At least
> then we have something that works for most people and something
> we can fix bugs in, rather than a gaping hole in capability.
>

We can have different criteria for different parts of the tree. 
Undesirable, but tradeoffs have to be made.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function