qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Better qemu/kvm defaults (was Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang


From: Dor Laor
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Better qemu/kvm defaults (was Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS)
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:59:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0

On 01/04/2012 12:45 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:

When using 'guests-pick', we initially present the most compatible
network model (rtl8139, for instance). We would provide a paravirtual
channel (guest-agent?) that could be used to enumerate which models were
available and let guest decide which model to use for the next reboot.
You could also enable immediate switch over using hot plug.

If guest uses an agent, it probably has virtio-serial driver and it
indicates it
has other virtio ones, otherwise, the agent won't fly

Right, but I still you want the ability for the guest to indicate that
it would like to use virtio drivers or not.

It would probably require a PCI 4.0 edition...

If you think about it, it makes no sense to choose which type of device
gets used in the hypervisor.  In an ideal world, the guest would just
figure out what it wants to see and get that.

The same is probably true about most device model properties.  rtc clock
slew policy is another good example.  Instead of trying to figure out
what the guest type is, we should just let the guest request device
model settings like that.

The poor guest only wanted to have a real time clock that works w/ fine grain time stamps. It was x86 vendors w/ the help of few programmers who kept addition various ideas like tsc, hpet, constant_tsc, non stop tsc, really really non stop tsc + timer,...

Cheers,
Dor



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]