|
From: | Jan Kiszka |
Subject: | [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics? |
Date: | Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:46:39 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Hi again, do we need some KVM knob comparable to qemu-kvm's -kvm-shadow-memory in upstream? If yes: The underlying IOCTL is x86-only. Are other archs interested in this long-term as well, ie. should the control become arch-independent? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |