qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory sem

From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:39:01 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 
On 2012-01-19 18:28, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:46:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> do we need some KVM knob comparable to qemu-kvm's -kvm-shadow-memory in
>> upstream?
>>
>> If yes: The underlying IOCTL is x86-only. Are other archs interested in
>> this long-term as well, ie. should the control become arch-independent?
>>
>> Jan
> 
> Last time i asked about removal, Avi wished for it to remain.
> 

Then I guess he should comment on this after returning to work. :)

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]