Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/7] target-arm: Use IoC for CPU init

[Anthony Liguori]

On 01/29/2012 05:50 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Instead of having each CPU's class_init function call its parent's
> function, indirect this through arm_cpu_class_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<address@hidden>
> ---
>   target-arm/cpu-core.c |   10 +++++++++-
>   1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu-core.c b/target-arm/cpu-core.c
> index b1ac22c..cdd049e 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu-core.c
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu-core.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,13 @@ static void arm_cpu_realize(Object *obj)
>       cpu->env.cp15.c0_cpuid = cpu_class->id;
>   }
>
> +static void arm_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> +{
> +    const struct ARMCPUDef *d = data;
> +
> +    (*d->class_init)(klass, NULL);
> +}
> +
>   static void cpu_register(const struct ARMCPUDef *def)
>   {
>       TypeInfo type = {
> @@ -254,7 +261,8 @@ static void cpu_register(const struct ARMCPUDef *def)
>           .instance_size = sizeof(ARMCPU),
>           .instance_init = arm_cpu_realize,
>           .class_size = sizeof(ARMCPUClass),
> -        .class_init = def->class_init,
> +        .class_init = arm_cpu_class_init,
> +        .class_data = (void *)def,

Would be better IMHO to embed the data needed by class_init in class_data.  That 
way we're not going through multiple method tables.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>       };
>
>       type_register_static(&type);