On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The reference that is returned by qdev_device_add is never given
back, so that device_del does not cause the refcount to go to zero
(and thus does nothing).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini<address@hidden>
This isn't needed in qom-upstream.14. Here's why:
object_init does not increase the reference count
object_property_add_child increases the reference count
object_new increases the reference count
object_delete decrements the reference count
object_property_del_child decreases the reference count
object_delete calls object_property_del_child(obj->parent, obj)
qdev_device_add calls object_new and object_property_add_child
-> ref == 2
qdev_device_del calls object_delete
-> ref -= 2
In qom-upstream.13, object_delete wasn't calling
object_property_del_child which is why you saw the behavior you did.
This problem would still exist with a composed device so dropping the
reference here isn't enough.