[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] CODING_STYLE: Clarify style for enum and function
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] CODING_STYLE: Clarify style for enum and function type names |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:32:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:29:49PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Clarify that enum type names and function type names should follow
> the CamelCase style used for structured type names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> During a conversation on IRC with Anthony, I realised that the coding
> standard isn't entirely clear about what convention should be followed
> for enum and function types. This patch resolves that by saying they
> should be CamelCase like structured type names, based on Anthony's
> suggestion. I've tagged this as an RFC in case anybody would rather
> we went the other way instead...
>
> CODING_STYLE | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Thanks, applied to the trivial patches tree:
https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/trivial-patches
Stefan