qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] qtest: add support for -M pc


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] qtest: add support for -M pc
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:12:39 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15

On 02/25/2012 02:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/25/2012 08:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This involves replacing the local APIC with the qtest interrupt controller.

It should be pretty straight forward to do the same for other machine types.

Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori<address@hidden>
---
  hw/pc_piix.c |    3 +++
  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
index 5e11d15..2c0881e 100644
--- a/hw/pc_piix.c
+++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
  #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
  #  include<xen/hvm/hvm_info_table.h>
  #endif
+#include "qtest.h"

  #define MAX_IDE_BUS 2

@@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
          i8259 = kvm_i8259_init(isa_bus);
      } else if (xen_enabled()) {
          i8259 = xen_interrupt_controller_init();
+    } else if (qtest_enabled()) {
+        i8259 = qtest_interrupt_controller_init();
      } else {
          cpu_irq = pc_allocate_cpu_irq();
          i8259 = i8259_init(isa_bus, cpu_irq[0]);

This is not needed anymore.

Why?  This is necessary for IRQ to work.

You mean, if you use irq_intercept, this isn't needed?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


Paolo






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]