Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm

[Martin Mailand]

Hi Stefan,
you are right, the performance for the commits 0b9b128530b and 
4fefc55ab04d are both good.
What is the best approach to stay in the qemu-kvm.git history?

-martin

On 29.02.2012 09:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I suggest testing both of the qemu-kvm.git merge commits, 0b9b128530b
> and 4fefc55ab04d.  My guess is you will find they perform the same,
> i.e. the qemu.git commits which were merged did not affect performance
> in qemu-kvm.git.  That would be evidence that git-bisect has not
> located the real culprit.