[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Mar 2012 22:02:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 07:51:02PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 17:35, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 05:07:34PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 15:22, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 02:35:28PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 14:23, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:38:38PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 13:28, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:37:57PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:21, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 10:27:24AM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 09:46, Michael S. Tsirkin
> >> >> >> >> >> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > commit 5caef97a16010f818ea8b950e2ee24ba876643ad introduced
> >> >> >> >> >> > a regression: we do not make IO base/limit upper 16
> >> >> >> >> >> > bit registers writeable, so we should report a 16 bit
> >> >> >> >> >> > IO range type, not a 32 bit one.
> >> >> >> >> >> > Note that PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_32 is 0x0, but
> >> >> >> >> >> > PCI_IO_RANGE_TYPE_32 is 0x1.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > In particular, this broke sparc64.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Note: this just reverts to behaviour prior to the patch.
> >> >> >> >> >> > Making PCI_IO_BASE_UPPER16 and PCI_IO_LIMIT_UPPER16
> >> >> >> >> >> > registers writeable should, and seems to, work just as well,
> >> >> >> >> >> > but
> >> >> >> >> >> > as no system seems to actually be interested in 32 bit IO,
> >> >> >> >> >> > let's not make unnecessary changes.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Reported-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Mark, can you confirm that this fixes the bug for you?
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> No, running
> >> >> >> >> >> qemu-system-sparc64 -serial stdio
> >> >> >> >> >> still shows black screen and the following on console:
> >> >> >> >> >> OpenBIOS for Sparc64
> >> >> >> >> >> Unhandled Exception 0x0000000000000032
> >> >> >> >> >> PC = 0x00000000ffd19e18 NPC = 0x00000000ffd19e1c
> >> >> >> >> >> Stopping execution
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > The weird thing is the range type does not seem to be accessed
> >> >> >> >> > at all. So I guessed there's some memory corruption here.
> >> >> >> >> > Running valgrind shows this:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > --11114-- WARNING: unhandled syscall: 340
> >> >> >> >> > --11114-- You may be able to write your own handler.
> >> >> >> >> > --11114-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
> >> >> >> >> > --11114-- Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
> >> >> >> >> > --11114-- it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Invalid read of size 4
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== at 0x2A68C0: pci_apb_init (apb_pci.c:350)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x2F7A84: sun4uv_init (sun4u.c:779)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x13D716: main (vl.c:3397)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Address 0x156c7d30 is 0 bytes after a block of size
> >> >> >> >> > 64
> >> >> >> >> > alloc'd
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== at 0x557DD69: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x225F56: malloc_and_trace (vl.c:2156)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x584AFEC: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2800.8)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x584B528: g_malloc0 (in
> >> >> >> >> > /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2800.8)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x19C50C: qemu_allocate_irqs (irq.c:47)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x2F7A4C: sun4uv_init (sun4u.c:778)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x13D716: main (vl.c:3397)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114==
> >> >> >> >> > apb: here
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change:
> >> >> >> >> > 0xfec42cbc -->
> >> >> >> >> > 0x16894008
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=398791500
> >> >> >> >> > or
> >> >> >> >> > greater
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change:
> >> >> >> >> > 0x16893fa0 -->
> >> >> >> >> > 0xfec42cc0
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=398791392
> >> >> >> >> > or
> >> >> >> >> > greater
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change:
> >> >> >> >> > 0xfec42fe0 -->
> >> >> >> >> > 0x16893fd0
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=398790640
> >> >> >> >> > or
> >> >> >> >> > greater
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== further instances of this message will not
> >> >> >> >> > be shown.
> >> >> >> >> > QEMU 1.0.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
> >> >> >> >> > (qemu) ==11114== Thread 2:
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised
> >> >> >> >> > value(s)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== at 0x2A8351: compute_all_sub (cc_helper.c:37)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x2A8782: helper_compute_psr (cc_helper.c:470)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x9AD9A19: ???
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114==
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised
> >> >> >> >> > value(s)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== at 0x2A827C: compute_all_sub_xcc (cc_helper.c:60)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x2A8795: helper_compute_psr (cc_helper.c:473)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x9AD9A19: ???
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114==
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised
> >> >> >> >> > value(s)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== at 0x2A8296: compute_all_sub_xcc (cc_helper.c:295)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x2A8795: helper_compute_psr (cc_helper.c:473)
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114== by 0x9AD9A19: ???
> >> >> >> >> > ==11114==
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Is the above a problem?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> It looks like Sparc does not reset registers at CPU reset. Nice
> >> >> >> >> catch.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Invalid read and address after block are also worrying.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > irqs are allocated with
> >> >> >> > #define MAX_PILS 16
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > irq = qemu_allocate_irqs(cpu_set_irq, env, MAX_PILS);
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > then passed to apb:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > pci_bus = pci_apb_init(APB_SPECIAL_BASE, APB_MEM_BASE, irq,
> >> >> >> > &pci_bus2,
> >> >> >> > &pci_bus3);
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > which does:
> >> >> >> > PCIBus *pci_apb_init(target_phys_addr_t special_base,
> >> >> >> > target_phys_addr_t mem_base,
> >> >> >> > qemu_irq *pic, PCIBus **bus2, PCIBus **bus3)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> >> >> >> > sysbus_connect_irq(s, i, pic[i]);
> >> >> >> > }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Awful. But using 32 for MAX_PILS does not help either.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Could you please clarify what is the SABRE device?
> >> >> > Is it, in fact, a bridge device? Or not?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, it's the host bridge, also known as PBM. It's documented in
> >> >> UltraSPARC IIi User's Manual
> >> >
> >> > Btw would be nice to host the manuals at qemu.org
> >> > our code points at sun.com URLs :(
> >>
> >> I have most if not all manuals, downloaded from sun.com, but I'm not
> >> sure if they can be redistributed.
> >
> > Okay ...
> > Let's change the link to point to some other place which has them?
> >
> >> > I am looking at 19.3.1 PCI Configuration Space
> >> > and it appears to show that this is a regular device
> >> > with a couple of custom registers at pffsets 0x40
> >> > and 0x41.
> >> >
> >> > Why do we want to pretend it is a bridge?
> >>
> >> It's the host bridge and the device class is PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST.
> >
> > Yes. But the *header* type is 0 (NORMAL)
> > while the code in pci_init_mask_bridge
> > which is the only user of the is_bridge register
> > initializes a type 1 (BRIDGE) header.
> >
> > So it just happens to do a vaguely correct thing.
>
> Well, that is still according to device spec.
I tried to find anything in the spec that says any register
after 0x10 is implemented but failed.
Can you tell me which chater and what it says?
> >> >
> >> >> and there it says that the device is
> >> >> found in the configuration space.
> >> >>
> >> >> The secondary bridges are Simbas and should be called APBs.
> >> >
> >> > As far as I can see from the code, it has header type
> >> > NORMAL but sets is_bridge.
> >> > This was done by this commit:
> >> > 776e1bbb6cf4fe66a93c1a5dd814bbb650deca00
> >>
> >> IIRC otherwise some registers are not writable.
> >
> > Yes but which ones? I looked at the manual and
> > it does not list any registers. Playing with code,
> > it looks like we just need to make *some*
> > BAR writeable. I tried with
> > pci_set_long(d->wmask + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 0xfffffff0);
> > to
> > pci_set_long(d->wmask + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_5, 0xfffffff0);
> >
> > and any one of these makes bios get at least to
> > the prompt.
>
> I now know the root cause of the problem. OpenBIOS programs the BARs
> somewhat correctly just by accident. The initial io_base and mem_base
> for BARs are not correct, but because the host bridge BARs (and also 6
> of which 4 are not even BARs!) are programmed first, the bases
> happened to settle to values that happen to work. The commit revealed
> the problem since the settling didn't happen. The mask changes just
> let the host bridge setup continue to do the magic.
>
> By just changing OpenBIOS (see attached patch), I can get the devices
> to work (assuming that VGA is a separate problem). There's no need to
> change QEMU.
>
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > MST
> From 3f957e2dc8477f00f6d3a9491d81399ee750c725 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
> From: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 19:46:38 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] pci: fix BAR setup
>
> A change in QEMU on how PCI bridges are setup revealed
> a bug in OpenBIOS PCI setup. On Sparc64, the BARs just
> happened to get somewhat correct values by accident before
> the commit but not after the change.
>
> Avoid to set up BARs for host bridge. Fix bridge
> check, this lead to setting up 6 BARs instead of more
> correct 2. If a bridge doesn't have any devices behind it,
> disable it entirely. Fix Sparc64 PCI memory base.
>
> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> ---
> arch/sparc64/openbios.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/pci.h | 7 +++++
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc64/openbios.c b/arch/sparc64/openbios.c
> index ac709fe..a1544a8 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc64/openbios.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc64/openbios.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static const struct hwdef hwdefs[] = {
> .cfg_base = APB_SPECIAL_BASE,
> .cfg_len = 0x2000000,
> .host_mem_base = APB_MEM_BASE,
> - .pci_mem_base = 0,
> + .pci_mem_base = 0x10000000,
> .mem_len = 0x10000000,
> .io_base = APB_SPECIAL_BASE + 0x2000000ULL, // PCI Bus I/O space
> .io_len = 0x10000,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci.c b/drivers/pci.c
> index f8c6414..6ed0c03 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci.c
> @@ -966,11 +966,18 @@ static void ob_pci_configure_bar(pci_addr addr,
> pci_config_t *config,
> size = min_align;
> reloc = (reloc + size -1) & ~(size - 1);
> if (*io_base == base) {
> + PCI_DPRINTF("changing io_base from 0x%lx to 0x%x\n",
> + *io_base, reloc + size);
> *io_base = reloc + size;
> reloc -= arch->io_base;
> } else {
> + PCI_DPRINTF("changing mem_base from 0x%lx to 0x%x\n",
> + *mem_base, reloc + size);
> *mem_base = reloc + size;
> }
> + PCI_DPRINTF("Configuring BARs for %s: reloc 0x%x omask 0x%x "
> + "io_base 0x%lx mem_base 0x%lx\n",
> + config->path, reloc, *p_omask, *io_base, *mem_base);
> pci_config_write32(addr, config_addr, reloc | *p_omask);
> config->assigned[reg] = reloc | *p_omask;
> }
> @@ -1021,26 +1028,30 @@ ob_pci_configure(pci_addr addr, pci_config_t *config,
> int num_regs, int rom_bar,
> pci_config_write16(addr, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
> }
>
> -static void ob_configure_pci_device(const char* parent_path,
> - int *bus_num, unsigned long *mem_base, unsigned long *io_base,
> - int bus, int devnum, int fn, int *p_is_multi);
> +static int ob_configure_pci_device(const char* parent_path,
> + int *bus_num, unsigned long *mem_base,
> + unsigned long *io_base, int bus, int
> devnum,
> + int fn, int *p_is_multi);
>
> -static void ob_scan_pci_bus(int *bus_num, unsigned long *mem_base,
> - unsigned long *io_base, const char *path,
> - int bus)
> +static int ob_scan_pci_bus(int *bus_num, unsigned long *mem_base,
> + unsigned long *io_base, const char *path,
> + int bus)
> {
> - int devnum, fn, is_multi;
> + int devnum, fn, is_multi, ndevices = 0;
>
> PCI_DPRINTF("\nScanning bus %d at %s...\n", bus, path);
>
> for (devnum = 0; devnum < 32; devnum++) {
> is_multi = 0;
> for (fn = 0; fn==0 || (is_multi && fn<8); fn++) {
> - ob_configure_pci_device(path, bus_num, mem_base, io_base,
> - bus, devnum, fn, &is_multi);
> + ndevices += ob_configure_pci_device(path, bus_num,
> + mem_base, io_base,
> + bus, devnum, fn,
> + &is_multi);
>
> }
> }
> + return ndevices;
> }
>
> static void ob_configure_pci_bridge(pci_addr addr,
> @@ -1048,6 +1059,9 @@ static void ob_configure_pci_bridge(pci_addr addr,
> unsigned long *io_base,
> int primary_bus, pci_config_t *config)
> {
> + int ndevices;
> + uint8_t command;
> +
> config->primary_bus = primary_bus;
> pci_config_write8(addr, PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, config->primary_bus);
>
> @@ -1062,16 +1076,30 @@ static void ob_configure_pci_bridge(pci_addr addr,
>
> /* make pci bridge parent device, prepare for recursion */
>
> - ob_scan_pci_bus(bus_num, mem_base, io_base,
> - config->path, config->secondary_bus);
> + ndevices = ob_scan_pci_bus(bus_num, mem_base, io_base,
> + config->path, config->secondary_bus);
> + if (!ndevices) {
> + /* no devices, disable bridging */
> + PCI_DPRINTF("disabling bridge %s\n", config->path);
> + command = pci_config_read8(addr, PCI_COMMAND);
> + command &= ~(PCI_COMMAND_IO | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY |
> + PCI_COMMAND_VGA_PALETTE | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER);
> + pci_config_write8(addr, PCI_COMMAND, command);
> + pci_config_write8(addr, PCI_IO_BASE, 0);
> + pci_config_write8(addr, PCI_IO_LIMIT, 0);
> + pci_config_write8(addr, PCI_MEMORY_BASE, 0);
> + pci_config_write8(addr, PCI_MEMORY_LIMIT, 0);
> + return;
> + }
>
> /* bus scan updates *bus_num to last revealed pci bus number */
> config->subordinate_bus = *bus_num;
> pci_config_write8(addr, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS, config->subordinate_bus);
>
> - PCI_DPRINTF("bridge %s PCI bus primary=%d secondary=%d subordinate=%d\n",
> - config->path, config->primary_bus, config->secondary_bus,
> - config->subordinate_bus);
> + PCI_DPRINTF("bridge %s PCI bus primary=%d secondary=%d subordinate=%d"
> + " ndev=%d\n",
> + config->path, config->primary_bus, config->secondary_bus,
> + config->subordinate_bus, ndevices);
>
> pci_set_bus_range(config);
> }
> @@ -1117,7 +1145,7 @@ static int ob_pci_read_identification(int bus, int
> devnum, int fn,
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static void ob_configure_pci_device(const char* parent_path,
> +static int ob_configure_pci_device(const char* parent_path,
> int *bus_num, unsigned long *mem_base, unsigned long *io_base,
> int bus, int devnum, int fn, int *p_is_multi)
> {
> @@ -1133,7 +1161,7 @@ static void ob_configure_pci_device(const char*
> parent_path,
> int is_host_bridge = 0;
>
> if (!ob_pci_read_identification(bus, devnum, fn, &vid, &did, &class,
> &subclass)) {
> - return;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> addr = PCI_ADDR(bus, devnum, fn);
> @@ -1195,16 +1223,18 @@ static void ob_configure_pci_device(const char*
> parent_path,
>
> if (get_property(phandle, "vendor-id", NULL)) {
> PCI_DPRINTF("host bridge already configured\n");
> - return;
> + return 0;
> }
> }
>
> activate_dev(phandle);
>
> - if (htype & PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> + if (htype & PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE || (class == PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE)) {
> + PCI_DPRINTF("Bridge 2 bars, htype %x\n", htype);
> num_bars = 2;
> rom_bar = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1;
> } else {
> + PCI_DPRINTF("Device 6 bars, htype %x\n", htype);
> num_bars = 6;
> rom_bar = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS;
> }
> @@ -1240,6 +1270,7 @@ static void ob_configure_pci_device(const char*
> parent_path,
>
> ob_configure_pci_bridge(addr, bus_num, mem_base, io_base, bus,
> &config);
> }
> + return 1;
> }
>
> int ob_pci_init(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci.h b/drivers/pci.h
> index 0f6ae1f..4314507 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> #define PCI_COMMAND 0x04
> #define PCI_COMMAND_IO 0x01
> #define PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY 0x02
> +#define PCI_COMMAND_MASTER 0x4 /* Enable bus mastering */
> +#define PCI_COMMAND_VGA_PALETTE 0x20 /* Enable palette snooping */
>
> #define PCI_STATUS 0x06 /* 16 bits */
> #define PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST 0x10 /* Support Capability List */
> @@ -44,6 +46,11 @@
> #define PCI_BASE_ADDR_4 0x20
> #define PCI_BASE_ADDR_5 0x24
>
> +#define PCI_IO_BASE 0x1c /* I/O range behind the bridge */
> +#define PCI_IO_LIMIT 0x1d
> +#define PCI_MEMORY_BASE 0x20 /* Memory range behind */
> +#define PCI_MEMORY_LIMIT 0x22
> +
> #define PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID 0x2c
> #define PCI_SUBSYSTEM_ID 0x2e
>
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Blue Swirl, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2012/03/04
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix bridge IO/BASE, Avi Kivity, 2012/03/04