[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:59:11 +0000 |
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Martin Mailand <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 05.03.2012 17:35, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>
>>> 1. Test on i7 Laptop with Cpu governor "ondemand".
>>> >
>>> > v0.14.1
>>> > bw=63492KB/s iops=15873
>>> > bw=63221KB/s iops=15805
>>> >
>>> > v1.0
>>> > bw=36696KB/s iops=9173
>>> > bw=37404KB/s iops=9350
>>> >
>>> > master
>>> > bw=36396KB/s iops=9099
>>> > bw=34182KB/s iops=8545
>>> >
>>> > Change the Cpu governor to "performance"
>>> > master
>>> > bw=81756KB/s iops=20393
>>> > bw=81453KB/s iops=20257
>>
>> Interesting finding. Did you show the 0.14.1 results with
>> "performance" governor?
>
>
>
> Hi Stefan,
> all results are with "ondemand" except the one where I changed it to
> "performance"
>
> Do you want a v0.14.1 test with the governor on "performance"?
Yes, the reason why that would be interesting is because it allows us
to put the performance gain with master+"performance" into
perspective. We could see how much of a change we get.
Does the CPU governor also affect the result when you benchmark with
real disks instead of ramdisk? I can see how the governor would
affect ramdisk, but would expect real disk I/O to be impacted much
less.
Stefan
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Dongsu Park, 2012/03/06