qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][v2] configure: change endianness test


From: Stefan Weil
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][v2] configure: change endianness test
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:24:54 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19

Am 14.03.2012 21:37, schrieb Stuart Yoder:
From: Stuart Yoder <address@hidden>

Remove the runtime check for endianness, and for platforms
that can be bit or little endian do a compile time check.

This resolves an issue encountered building QEMU
under Yocto which was not setting --cross-prefix.

Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <address@hidden>
---

-v2: removed the dynamic runtime test completely,
added compile time check for mips

configure | 33 ++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure b/configure
index fe4fc4f..d9c5999 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -1269,41 +1269,24 @@ feature_not_found() {
exit 1;
}

-if test -z "$cross_prefix" ; then
-
-# ---
-# big/little endian test
-cat > $TMPC << EOF
-#include <inttypes.h>
-int main(int argc, char ** argv){
- volatile uint32_t i=0x01234567;
- return (*((uint8_t*)(&i))) == 0x67;
-}
-EOF
-
-if compile_prog "" "" ; then
-$TMPE && bigendian="yes"
-else
-echo big/little test failed
-fi
-
-else
-
-# if cross compiling, cannot launch a program, so make a static guess
+##########################################
+# endianness check
case "$cpu" in
arm)
- # ARM can be either way; ask the compiler which one we are
if check_define __ARMEB__; then
bigendian=yes
fi
;;
- hppa|m68k|mips|mips64|ppc|ppc64|s390|s390x|sparc|sparc64)
+ mips|mips64)
+ if check_define __MIPSEB__; then
+ bigendian=yes
+ fi
+ ;;
+ hppa|m68k|ppc|ppc64|s390|s390x|sparc|sparc64)
bigendian=yes
;;
esac

-fi
-
##########################################
# NPTL probe


The patch fixes all issues which were addressed in the discussion,
therefore

Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>

Nevertheless the old test which was removed still might be useful
and could be re-added later in a modified form:

Contrary to Paul's argument QEMU does not only support a fixed
set of known host architectures, but also unknown hosts (via TCI).
For those, there remains a small chance that they are big endian
and that they get the wrong endianness now. TCI is still experimental,
so I don't care too much about this small deficit.

Regards,
Stefan W.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]