qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 11/14 v9] introduce a new monitor command '


From: Wen Congyang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 11/14 v9] introduce a new monitor command 'dump' to dump guest's memory
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:29:46 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100413 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4

At 03/15/2012 01:18 AM, Luiz Capitulino Wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:11:35 +0800
> Wen Congyang <address@hidden> wrote:
> 

<cut>

> 
> You just dropped a few asynchronous bits and resent this as a synchronous
> command, letting all the asynchronous infrastructure in. This is bad, as the
> command is more complex then it should be and doesn't make full use of the
> added infrastructure.
> 
> For example, does the synchronous version really uses DumpState? If it 
> doesn't,
> let's just drop it and everything else which is not necessary.
> 
> *However*, note that while it's fine with me to have this as a synchronous
> command we need a few more ACKs (from libvirt and Anthony and/or Jan). So, I
> wouldn't go too far on making changes before we get those ACKs.
> 


Hi, Anthony, Luiz, Eric, Jan

At 03/15/2012 01:49 AM, Anthony Liguori Wrote:
> 
> Can we start by posting a non-RFC because we start discussing committing
> this.

At 03/15/2012 01:37 AM, Eric Blake Wrote:
> are sufficient that I'm okay with a synchronous-only version for qemu
> 1.1.

So I think Anthony and Eric may ACK to it.

Jan reviewed the early version, and give many comments. So I think he also ACKs 
to it.

Is it OK to post non-RFC version?

Thanks
Wen Congyang



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]