qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp_output_visitor_cleanup(): fix double free


From: Michael Roth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp_output_visitor_cleanup(): fix double free
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:43:32 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 08:16:12PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Stack entries in QmpOutputVisitor are navigation links (weak references),
> except the bottom (ie. least recently added) entry, which owns the root
> QObject [1]. Make qmp_output_visitor_cleanup() drop the stack entries,
> then release the QObject tree by the root.
> 
> Attempting to serialize an invalid enum inside a dictionary is an example
> for triggering the double free.
> 
> [1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-03/msg03276.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>

Tested-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>

Looks good. Did you or Paolo want to re-send that test case with a SoB?
I have a test case that triggers this by manually calling error_set(),
but I think yours is better.

> ---
>  qapi/qmp-output-visitor.c |    8 +++++---
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qapi/qmp-output-visitor.c b/qapi/qmp-output-visitor.c
> index e0697b0..2bce9d5 100644
> --- a/qapi/qmp-output-visitor.c
> +++ b/qapi/qmp-output-visitor.c
> @@ -199,14 +199,16 @@ void qmp_output_visitor_cleanup(QmpOutputVisitor *v)
>  {
>      QStackEntry *e, *tmp;
> 
> +    /* The bottom QStackEntry, if any, owns the root QObject. See the
> +     * qmp_output_push_obj() invocations in qmp_output_add_obj(). */
> +    QObject *root = QTAILQ_EMPTY(&v->stack) ? NULL : qmp_output_first(v);
> +
>      QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(e, &v->stack, node, tmp) {
>          QTAILQ_REMOVE(&v->stack, e, node);
> -        if (e->value) {
> -            qobject_decref(e->value);
> -        }
>          g_free(e);
>      }
> 
> +    qobject_decref(root);
>      g_free(v);
>  }
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]