Re: [Qemu-devel] ARM QOM conversion / class hierarchy

[Peter Maydell]

On 20 March 2012 16:31, Michael Roth <address@hidden> wrote:
> Rather than key off an ID you could also just break
> implementation-specific functionality out into a set of interfaces you
> implement/override as part of the objects' initialization. Same ends, and
> still fits the model pretty nicely, assuming the functionality is all
> derivable from the common base-class.

I'm not sure what you have in mind here -- could you explain
in a little more detail, please?

thanks
-- PMM