qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix '-cpu ?' Segfault


From: Michael Roth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix '-cpu ?' Segfault
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:31:48 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:28:16AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 08:33 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >Fix stupid copy&paste mistake at commit
> >ecf40beae7dcbb057d4f115207f9d8276832a774: I moved code around but kept
> >"optarg" on the cpu_list() call.
> >
> >Reported-by: Jiri Denemark<address@hidden>
> >Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost<address@hidden>
> >---
> >  vl.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> >index 112b0e0..0fccf50 100644
> >--- a/vl.c
> >+++ b/vl.c
> >@@ -3196,7 +3196,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> >      cpudef_init();
> >
> >      if (cpu_model&&  *cpu_model == '?') {
> >-        list_cpus(stdout,&fprintf, optarg);
> >+        list_cpus(stdout,&fprintf, cpu_model);
> >          exit(0);
> >      }
> >
> Does -cpu ? actually work then? I only see the list of cpus when
> using -cpu ?_ for example.

I think this is actually just a shell issue:

address@hidden:~/tmp/empty$ ls
address@hidden:~/tmp/empty$ echo ?
?
address@hidden:~/tmp/empty$ touch a
address@hidden:~/tmp/empty$ echo ?
a
address@hidden:~/tmp/empty$ echo ?_
?_

> 
>    Stefan
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]