[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Why we need unlink tb when cpu_interrupt/cpu_exit get c
From: |
陳韋任 |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Why we need unlink tb when cpu_interrupt/cpu_exit get called? |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:21:23 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
> Try following with and without tb unlinking on aforementioned image to
> feel the difference:
>
> sh-2.05b# echo "char main[]={0xeb,-2};" >h.c
> sh-2.05b# tcc -run h.c
I think the example you gave me is an infinite loop, right? O.K., here is
what I got.
Case 1. With tb unlinking
- tcc runs infinitely and I can not stop it by using Ctrl + C. But I can use
Ctrl + C to kill QEMU itself.
Case 2. Without tb unlinking (I comment out the function body of
cpu_unlink_tb)
- tcc runs infinitely and without any responding. In case 1, the guest OS
can
respond to my keyboard. Besides, Ctrl + C can not terminate QEMU, I have
to
use `kill` to stop it.
Is this what you expect?
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj