qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7 v5] VMXNET3 paravirtualized device implement


From: Gerhard Wiesinger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7 v5] VMXNET3 paravirtualized device implementation Interface type "vmxnet3" added.
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 21:00:18 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)

On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Izik Eidus wrote:

What about this patch?, everything that was asked from Dmitry was 
accomplished...
What prevent us from progressing with merging this patch?


As already discussed on the list patch v5 doesn't work at least for me. 
Previous patches worked better but were not stable under load.

I'm also appreciating a working version and integrating the patch fast.

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/

Hello Gerhard,

1. I understand that you send your exact command line to Dmitry and
your test scripts, but we cannot reproduce the issues. Can you send us
host network configuration?

2. Is it possibleĀ for you to run tcpdump on the guest and on the host
and send us the files for review?

Since there was no difference for v5 patch, I already sent this for v4 patch:

See:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-03/msg04062.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-03/msg04634.html

I also sniffed between working NIC (rtl8139) and non working
NIC (vmxnet3) and as already thought in
//lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-03/msg04062.html
TCP offloading checksum is NOT correct.

From wireshark sniff:
Checksum SYN1: 0xe937 [incorrect, should be 0xe936 (maybe caused by "TCP checksum 
offload"?)]
Checksum SYN2: [incorrect, should be 0xe5af (maybe caused by "TCP checksum 
offload"?)]
=> checksum is always too high by 1.

Please fix it.

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]