[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support
From: |
Peter Crosthwaite |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Apr 2012 11:08:26 +1000 |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you intend the tristate masks to be used for?
> If the sending device puts the line into high-impedance presumably
> the receiving device is just going to read something random which
> it's supposed to ignore, so the sender could just send whatever
> it likes. We're not modelling multiple devices sending at once,
> which is the only case I can think of where you'd need to care
> which bits each device was tristating for.
>
> -- PMM
Hi Peter,
I managed to get all the tristate behaviours out of my controller and
device models so we can drop this as you have suggested, so we can
drop that change to ssi.
Happy Easter,
Peter
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Maydell, 2012/04/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Crosthwaite, 2012/04/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Crosthwaite, 2012/04/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Paul Brook, 2012/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Maydell, 2012/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Paul Brook, 2012/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Crosthwaite, 2012/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Paul Brook, 2012/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Crosthwaite, 2012/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Maydell, 2012/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support,
Peter Crosthwaite <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] SPI: initial support, Peter Crosthwaite, 2012/04/02