[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/14] target-arm: Add QOM subclasses for each A
From: |
Andreas Färber |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/14] target-arm: Add QOM subclasses for each ARM cpu implementation |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:09:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 |
Am 30.03.2012 14:51, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> Register subclasses for each ARM CPU implementation (with the
> exception of "pxa270", which is an alias for "pxa270-a0").
>
> Let arm_cpu_list() enumerate CPU subclasses in alphabetical order,
> except for special value "any".
>
> Replace cpu_arm_find_by_name()'s string -> CPUID lookup by storing the
> CPUID (aka MIDR, Main ID Register) value in the class.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> target-arm/cpu-qom.h | 5 +
> target-arm/cpu.c | 229
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> target-arm/helper.c | 114 +++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
> index 42d2a6b..1a3965f 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ typedef struct ARMCPU {
> /*< public >*/
>
> CPUARMState env;
> +
> + /* Configuration values (set by the instance init function);
> + * some of these might become properties eventually.
> + */
> + uint32_t midr;
> } ARMCPU;
>
> static inline ARMCPU *arm_env_get_cpu(CPUARMState *env)
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
> index c3ed45b..a09e24e 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,212 @@ static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *s)
> cpu_state_reset(&cpu->env);
> }
>
> +static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> +
> + memset(&cpu->env, 0, sizeof(CPUARMState));
This was actually papering over some bug in an earlier series of mine.
We can drop this line, it is being memset() before calling the initfn.
> + cpu_exec_init(&cpu->env);
> +
> + cpu->env.cpu_model_str = object_get_typename(obj);
This rules out adding arguments to the cpu_model like you wanted. We
should better leave that in cpu_arm_init().
> +}
> +
> +/* CPU models */
> +
> +static void arm926_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ARM926;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm946_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ARM946;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm1026_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ARM1026;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm1136_r2_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R2;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm1136_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ARM1136;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm1176_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ARM1176;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm11mpcore_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ARM11MPCORE;
> +}
> +
> +static void cortex_m3_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_CORTEXM3;
> +}
> +
> +static void cortex_a8_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_CORTEXA8;
> +}
> +
> +static void cortex_a9_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_CORTEXA9;
> +}
> +
> +static void cortex_a15_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_CORTEXA15;
> +}
> +
> +static void ti925t_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_TI925T;
> +}
> +
> +static void sa1100_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_SA1100;
> +}
> +
> +static void sa1110_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_SA1110;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa250_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA250;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa255_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA255;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa260_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA260;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa261_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA261;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa262_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA262;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa270a0_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA270_A0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa270a1_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA270_A1;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa270b0_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA270_B0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa270b1_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA270_B1;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa270c0_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA270_C0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pxa270c5_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_PXA270_C5;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_any_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> + cpu->midr = ARM_CPUID_ANY;
> +}
Dislike, I would prefer to copy the values of those defines here and to
drop as many as possible of those defines.
> +
> +typedef struct ARMCPUInfo {
> + const char *name;
> + void (*initfn)(Object *obj);
> +} ARMCPUInfo;
> +
> +static const ARMCPUInfo arm_cpus[] = {
> + { .name = "arm926", .initfn = arm926_initfn },
> + { .name = "arm946", .initfn = arm946_initfn },
> + { .name = "arm1026", .initfn = arm1026_initfn },
> + /* What QEMU calls "arm1136-r2" is actually the 1136 r0p2, i.e. an
> + * older core than plain "arm1136". In particular this does not
> + * have the v6K features.
> + */
> + { .name = "arm1136-r2", .initfn = arm1136_r2_initfn },
Please name the function according to what it actually is, no need to
propagate the error further. :)
> + { .name = "arm1136", .initfn = arm1136_initfn },
> + { .name = "arm1176", .initfn = arm1176_initfn },
> + { .name = "arm11mpcore", .initfn = arm11mpcore_initfn },
> + { .name = "cortex-m3", .initfn = cortex_m3_initfn },
> + { .name = "cortex-a8", .initfn = cortex_a8_initfn },
> + { .name = "cortex-a9", .initfn = cortex_a9_initfn },
> + { .name = "cortex-a15", .initfn = cortex_a15_initfn },
> + { .name = "ti925t", .initfn = ti925t_initfn },
> + { .name = "sa1100", .initfn = sa1100_initfn },
> + { .name = "sa1110", .initfn = sa1110_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa250", .initfn = pxa250_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa255", .initfn = pxa255_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa260", .initfn = pxa260_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa261", .initfn = pxa261_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa262", .initfn = pxa262_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa270-a0", .initfn = pxa270a0_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa270-a1", .initfn = pxa270a1_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa270-b0", .initfn = pxa270b0_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa270-b1", .initfn = pxa270b1_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa270-c0", .initfn = pxa270c0_initfn },
> + { .name = "pxa270-c5", .initfn = pxa270c5_initfn },
> + { .name = "any", .initfn = arm_any_initfn },
> +};
Like the initfn concept.
> +
> static void arm_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> {
> ARMCPUClass *acc = ARM_CPU_CLASS(oc);
> @@ -43,18 +249,37 @@ static void arm_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void
> *data)
> cc->reset = arm_cpu_reset;
> }
>
> +static void cpu_register(const ARMCPUInfo *info)
> +{
> + TypeInfo type = {
> + .name = info->name,
> + .parent = TYPE_ARM_CPU,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(ARMCPU),
> + .instance_init = info->initfn,
> + .class_size = sizeof(ARMCPUClass),
> + .class_init = arm_cpu_class_init,
> + };
> +
> + type_register_static(&type);
Note: I moved to naming it type_info for clarity elsewhere.
> +}
> +
> static const TypeInfo arm_cpu_type_info = {
> .name = TYPE_ARM_CPU,
> .parent = TYPE_CPU,
> .instance_size = sizeof(ARMCPU),
> - .abstract = false,
> + .instance_init = arm_cpu_initfn,
> + .abstract = true,
> .class_size = sizeof(ARMCPUClass),
> - .class_init = arm_cpu_class_init,
Why are you moving it to the other TypeInfo? If there's no compelling
reason I'd suggest to leave it here.
> };
>
> static void arm_cpu_register_types(void)
> {
> + int i;
> +
> type_register_static(&arm_cpu_type_info);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(arm_cpus); i++) {
> + cpu_register(&arm_cpus[i]);
> + }
> }
>
> type_init(arm_cpu_register_types)
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index d974b57..4748f80 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include "hw/loader.h"
> #endif
> #include "sysemu.h"
> +#include "cpu-qom.h"
Still needed?
>
> static uint32_t cortexa15_cp15_c0_c1[8] = {
> 0x00001131, 0x00011011, 0x02010555, 0x00000000,
> @@ -46,8 +47,6 @@ static uint32_t arm1176_cp15_c0_c1[8] =
> static uint32_t arm1176_cp15_c0_c2[8] =
> { 0x0140011, 0x12002111, 0x11231121, 0x01102131, 0x01141, 0, 0, 0 };
>
> -static uint32_t cpu_arm_find_by_name(const char *name);
> -
> static inline void set_feature(CPUARMState *env, int feature)
> {
> env->features |= 1u << feature;
> @@ -55,7 +54,6 @@ static inline void set_feature(CPUARMState *env, int
> feature)
>
> static void cpu_reset_model_id(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t id)
> {
> - env->cp15.c0_cpuid = id;
> switch (id) {
> case ARM_CPUID_ARM926:
> set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V5);
> @@ -201,7 +199,6 @@ static void cpu_reset_model_id(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t
> id)
> case ARM_CPUID_TI925T:
> set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V4T);
> set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_OMAPCP);
> - env->cp15.c0_cpuid = ARM_CPUID_TI925T; /* Depends on wiring. */
> env->cp15.c0_cachetype = 0x5109149;
> env->cp15.c1_sys = 0x00000070;
> env->cp15.c15_i_max = 0x000;
> @@ -287,6 +284,7 @@ void cpu_state_reset(CPUARMState *env)
> {
> uint32_t id;
> uint32_t tmp = 0;
> + ARMCPU *cpu = arm_env_get_cpu(env);
>
> if (qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_RESET)) {
> qemu_log("CPU Reset (CPU %d)\n", env->cpu_index);
> @@ -299,6 +297,7 @@ void cpu_state_reset(CPUARMState *env)
> if (id)
> cpu_reset_model_id(env, id);
> env->cp15.c15_config_base_address = tmp;
> + env->cp15.c0_cpuid = cpu->midr;
> #if defined (CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> env->uncached_cpsr = ARM_CPU_MODE_USR;
> /* For user mode we must enable access to coprocessors */
In the current stadium, cpu_state_reset() calls cpu_reset(), doesn't it?
In that case can we move the new ARMCPU-dependent code into the reset
function?
> @@ -405,24 +404,28 @@ static int vfp_gdb_set_reg(CPUARMState *env, uint8_t
> *buf, int reg)
>
> CPUARMState *cpu_arm_init(const char *cpu_model)
> {
> + ObjectClass *klass;
> ARMCPU *cpu;
> CPUARMState *env;
> - uint32_t id;
> static int inited = 0;
>
> - id = cpu_arm_find_by_name(cpu_model);
> - if (id == 0)
> + /* One legacy alias to check */
> + if (strcmp(cpu_model, "pxa270") == 0) {
> + cpu_model = "pxa270-a0";
> + }
(I am to blame for this, yes.) If we handle aliases this way, we won't
see it in an automated -cpu ? output. If that were desired, we could
instead have pxa270 be a subclass of the to aliases type.
Andreas
> +
> + klass = object_class_by_name(cpu_model);
> + if (klass == NULL) {
> return NULL;
> - cpu = ARM_CPU(object_new(TYPE_ARM_CPU));
> + }
> + cpu = ARM_CPU(object_new(cpu_model));
> env = &cpu->env;
> - cpu_exec_init(env);
> +
> if (tcg_enabled() && !inited) {
> inited = 1;
> arm_translate_init();
> }
>
> - env->cpu_model_str = cpu_model;
> - env->cp15.c0_cpuid = id;
> cpu_state_reset(env);
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_NEON)) {
> gdb_register_coprocessor(env, vfp_gdb_get_reg, vfp_gdb_set_reg,
> @@ -438,66 +441,51 @@ CPUARMState *cpu_arm_init(const char *cpu_model)
> return env;
> }
>
> -struct arm_cpu_t {
> - uint32_t id;
> - const char *name;
> -};
> -
> -static const struct arm_cpu_t arm_cpu_names[] = {
> - { ARM_CPUID_ARM926, "arm926"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_ARM946, "arm946"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_ARM1026, "arm1026"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_ARM1136, "arm1136"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R2, "arm1136-r2"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_ARM1176, "arm1176"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_ARM11MPCORE, "arm11mpcore"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_CORTEXM3, "cortex-m3"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_CORTEXA8, "cortex-a8"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_CORTEXA9, "cortex-a9"},
> - { ARM_CPUID_CORTEXA15, "cortex-a15" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_TI925T, "ti925t" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA250, "pxa250" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_SA1100, "sa1100" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_SA1110, "sa1110" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA255, "pxa255" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA260, "pxa260" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA261, "pxa261" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA262, "pxa262" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA270, "pxa270" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA270_A0, "pxa270-a0" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA270_A1, "pxa270-a1" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA270_B0, "pxa270-b0" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA270_B1, "pxa270-b1" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA270_C0, "pxa270-c0" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_PXA270_C5, "pxa270-c5" },
> - { ARM_CPUID_ANY, "any"},
> - { 0, NULL}
> -};
> +typedef struct ARMCPUListState {
> + fprintf_function cpu_fprintf;
> + FILE *file;
> +} ARMCPUListState;
>
> -void arm_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf)
> +/* Sort alphabetically by type name, except for "any". */
> +static gint arm_cpu_list_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
> {
> - int i;
> + ObjectClass *class_a = (ObjectClass *)a;
> + ObjectClass *class_b = (ObjectClass *)b;
> + const char *name_a, *name_b;
>
> - (*cpu_fprintf)(f, "Available CPUs:\n");
> - for (i = 0; arm_cpu_names[i].name; i++) {
> - (*cpu_fprintf)(f, " %s\n", arm_cpu_names[i].name);
> + name_a = object_class_get_name(class_a);
> + name_b = object_class_get_name(class_b);
> + if (strcmp(name_a, "any") == 0) {
> + return 1;
> + } else if (strcmp(name_b, "any") == 0) {
> + return -1;
> + } else {
> + return strcmp(name_a, name_b);
> }
> }
>
> -/* return 0 if not found */
> -static uint32_t cpu_arm_find_by_name(const char *name)
> +static void arm_cpu_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
> {
> - int i;
> - uint32_t id;
> + ObjectClass *klass = data;
> + ARMCPUListState *s = user_data;
>
> - id = 0;
> - for (i = 0; arm_cpu_names[i].name; i++) {
> - if (strcmp(name, arm_cpu_names[i].name) == 0) {
> - id = arm_cpu_names[i].id;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - return id;
> + (*s->cpu_fprintf)(s->file, " %s\n",
> + object_class_get_name(klass));
> +}
> +
> +void arm_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf)
> +{
> + ARMCPUListState s = {
> + .file = f,
> + .cpu_fprintf = cpu_fprintf,
> + };
> + GSList *list;
> +
> + list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_ARM_CPU, false);
> + list = g_slist_sort(list, arm_cpu_list_compare);
> + (*cpu_fprintf)(f, "Available CPUs:\n");
> + g_slist_foreach(list, arm_cpu_list_entry, &s);
> + g_slist_free(list);
> }
>
> static int bad_mode_switch(CPUARMState *env, int mode)
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/14] target-arm: Add QOM subclasses for each ARM cpu implementation,
Andreas Färber <=