qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 03/10] Add save_block_hdr function


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 03/10] Add save_block_hdr function
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:45:54 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1

On 04/18/2012 12:40 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori<address@hidden>  wrote:
On 04/11/2012 01:49 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman<address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Hudzia<address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Petter Svard<address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Aidan Shribman<address@hidden>
---
   arch_init.c |   26 ++++++++++++++------------
   1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch_init.c b/arch_init.c
index 2e534f1..47b9fef 100644
--- a/arch_init.c
+++ b/arch_init.c
@@ -347,6 +347,18 @@ void cache_resize(int64_t new_size)
       g_free(old_page_cache);
   }

+static void save_block_hdr(QEMUFile *f, RAMBlock *block, ram_addr_t offset,
+        int cont, int flag)
+{
+        qemu_put_be64(f, offset | cont | flag);
+        if (!cont) {
+                qemu_put_byte(f, strlen(block->idstr));
+                qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)block->idstr,
+                                strlen(block->idstr));
+        }
+
+}


Any time we're changing protocols/formats, we need to document it.  We
need a docs/xbzrle.txt (and it should be before this patch).

Agreed.

It's not clear to me how we preserve compatibility here either.
You're potentially passing garbage to an older QEMU.

I think not.  Only if you are migrating with the -x option.  And then,
you get what you asked for.

I thought I had previously asked for a monitor command to negotiate
extensions for migration?

I think it is in another patch.

So I think we also need:

{ 'command': 'set-migration-capabilities',
    'data': { 'enable': ['MigrationCapability'] }

Then a management tool just needs to:

    caps_from_src = query-migration-capabilities(src_qmp_session)
    caps_from_dst = query-migration-capabilities(dst_qmp_session)

    common_caps = intersection(caps_from_src, caps_from_dst)

    set-migration-capabilities(src_qmp_session, common_caps);
    set-migration-capabilities(dst_qmp_session, common_caps);

Then libvirt doesn't special code to handle XBRLE or whatever the next new migration protocol feature is. With the current patches, libvirt would need to create a table of:

   migration_features = {'xblre': '-x'}

Which would change every time we add a feature. That seems pretty undesirable to me.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


Later, Juan




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]