qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] gdbstub: Synchronize CPU state unconditionally


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] gdbstub: Synchronize CPU state unconditionally in gdb_set_cpu_pc
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:46:08 +0000

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 17:54, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> gdbstub isn't my domain, patches should go via Anthony or Blue
> I guess. Patchwork url:
>  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/146153/

Thanks, applied.

>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> On 16 April 2012 18:49, Alexander Graf <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Looks great to me, push it :)
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On 10.04.2012, at 14:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>> Combination ping^2 and apology for forgetting to cc qemu-ppc.
>>>
>>> -- PMM
>>>
>>> On 3 April 2012 12:57, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Ping?
>>>>
>>>> -- PMM
>>>>
>>>> On 12 March 2012 16:24, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Synchronize the CPU state via cpu_sychronize_state() unconditionally
>>>>> in gdb_set_cpu_pc() rather than only in some of the target ifdef
>>>>> ladder cases.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can divide the CPUs into three categories:
>>>>>  * non-KVM targets: no change of behaviour since we will use the
>>>>>   kvm-stub.c no-op function.
>>>>>  * i386 and s390: no change of behaviour since they were already
>>>>>   calling this function
>>>>>  * PPC (in KVM mode): this fixes an error: failing to synchronise
>>>>>   was accidental and probably a bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> This also paves the way for other targets (specifically ARM) which
>>>>> can add KVM support in future without having to add another target
>>>>> specific change to this bit of code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Alex: could you test the KVM PPC case, please, since that's the only
>>>>> one where we actually change behaviour here?
>>>>>
>>>>>  gdbstub.c |    3 +--
>>>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
>>>>> index ef95ac2..776dcc5 100644
>>>>> --- a/gdbstub.c
>>>>> +++ b/gdbstub.c
>>>>> @@ -1904,8 +1904,8 @@ static void gdb_breakpoint_remove_all(void)
>>>>>
>>>>>  static void gdb_set_cpu_pc(GDBState *s, target_ulong pc)
>>>>>  {
>>>>> -#if defined(TARGET_I386)
>>>>>     cpu_synchronize_state(s->c_cpu);
>>>>> +#if defined(TARGET_I386)
>>>>>     s->c_cpu->eip = pc;
>>>>>  #elif defined (TARGET_PPC)
>>>>>     s->c_cpu->nip = pc;
>>>>> @@ -1930,7 +1930,6 @@ static void gdb_set_cpu_pc(GDBState *s, 
>>>>> target_ulong pc)
>>>>>  #elif defined (TARGET_ALPHA)
>>>>>     s->c_cpu->pc = pc;
>>>>>  #elif defined (TARGET_S390X)
>>>>> -    cpu_synchronize_state(s->c_cpu);
>>>>>     s->c_cpu->psw.addr = pc;
>>>>>  #elif defined (TARGET_LM32)
>>>>>     s->c_cpu->pc = pc;
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
>          1         2         3         4         5         6         7        
>  8



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]