Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 23/35] vmstate: port arm cpu

[Peter Maydell]

On 4 May 2012 11:54, Juan Quintela <address@hidden> wrote:
> Use one subsection for each feature.  This means that we don't need to
> bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced.
>
> Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can "use"
> uncached_cpsr for saving state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-arm/cpu.h     |    5 +-
>  target-arm/machine.c |  344 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  2 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> index 9434902..37744c6 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> @@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
>     } cp[15];
>     void *nvic;
>     const struct arm_boot_info *boot_info;
> +
> +    /* Fields needed as intermediate for vmstate */
> +    uint32_t cpsr_vmstate;
>  } CPUARMState;

I still think this is the wrong approach. We need to support
"this is how you read/write this field" functions. See also
target-alpha handling of the fpcr.

-- PMM