qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v3] hotplug: add device per func in ACPI


From: Amos Kong
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v3] hotplug: add device per func in ACPI DSDT tables
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 16:59:49 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1

On 09/05/12 16:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:24:52PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
Boot up a Linux VM with 8 pci block devices which
are the 8 functions in one pci slot.
| # qemu-kvm ...
| -drive file=images/u0,if=none,id=drv0,format=qcow2,cache=none \
| -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drv0,id=v0,multifunction=on,addr=0x03.0 \
| ....
| -drive file=images/u7,if=none,id=drv7,format=qcow2,cache=none \
| -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drv7,id=v7,multifunction=on,addr=0x03.7 \

Check devices in guest.
| vm)# ls /dev/vd*
|    vda vdb vdc vde vdf vdg vdh
| vm)# lspci |grep block
| 00:03.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc Virtio block device
|    ...
| 00:03.7 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc Virtio block device
|

Func1~7 still exist in guest after hot-removing the whole slot
through qemu monitor.
| vm)# lspci |grep block    (00:03.0 disappeared)
| 00:03.1 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc Virtio block device (rev ff)
|    ...
| 00:03.7 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc Virtio block device (rev ff)
| vm)# ls /dev/vd*          (vda disappeared)
|    vdb vdc vde vdf vdg vdh
| vm)# mkfs /dev/vdb
|    INFO: task mkfs.ext2:1784 blocked for more than 120 seconds. (task hung)


Currently only func0 is defined in ACPI DSDT table
of seabios, and only hot-adding func0 would cause
a ACPI event for notification. Other funcs except
func0 wouldn't be registered in linux pci driver.
(we can only found func0 in slot->funcs list of
pci driver).

Isn't this what your patch 'PCI: Can continually add funcs after adding
func0' addresses?

No.

This patch fixes the problem that some funcs could not be removed.
the question is sending ACPI event for all functions (in same slot)
or only function 0.

I found all funcs are defined in ACPI DSDT table in microsoft's example:
http://www.microsoft.com/china/whdc/system/pnppwr/hotadd/hotplugpci.mspx#EUH

Is it a useful attestation ?

If yes it's commit f382a086f3129edc152b8044b69ccc6682e637bb in 3.4.

This commit fix the problem that some funcs could not be added.

So let's class the problematic behaviour guest bug and avoid workarounds
in bios?

--
                        Amos.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]