Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/8] kvm: Introduce basic MSI support for in-kernel irqchips

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:02:52PM -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> This patch basically adds kvm_irqchip_send_msi, a service for sending
> arbitrary MSI messages to KVM's in-kernel irqchip models.
> 
> As the current KVI API requires us to establish a static route from a
> pseudo GSI to the target MSI message and inject the MSI via toggling
> that GSI, we need to play some tricks to make this unfortunately
> interface transparent. We create those routes on demand and keep them
> in a hash table. Succeeding messages can then search for an existing
> route in the table first and reuse it whenever possible. If we should
> run out of limited GSIs, we simply flush the table and rebuild it as
> messages are sent.
> 
> This approach is rather simple and could be optimized further. However,
> future kernels will contain a more efficient MSI injection interface
> that will obsolete the GSI-based dynamic injection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
> ---
>  kvm-all.c |  139 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kvm.h     |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index 2d82d54..e7ed510 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include "qemu-barrier.h"
>  #include "sysemu.h"
>  #include "hw/hw.h"
> +#include "hw/msi.h"
>  #include "gdbstub.h"
>  #include "kvm.h"
>  #include "bswap.h"
> @@ -48,6 +49,8 @@
>      do { } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> +#define KVM_MSI_HASHTAB_SIZE    256
> +
>  typedef struct KVMSlot
>  {
>      target_phys_addr_t start_addr;
> @@ -59,6 +62,11 @@ typedef struct KVMSlot
>  
>  typedef struct kvm_dirty_log KVMDirtyLog;
>  
> +typedef struct KVMMSIRoute {
> +    struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute;
> +    QTAILQ_ENTRY(KVMMSIRoute) entry;
> +} KVMMSIRoute;
> +
>  struct KVMState
>  {
>      KVMSlot slots[32];
> @@ -87,6 +95,7 @@ struct KVMState
>      int nr_allocated_irq_routes;
>      uint32_t *used_gsi_bitmap;
>      unsigned int gsi_count;
> +    QTAILQ_HEAD(msi_hashtab, KVMMSIRoute) msi_hashtab[KVM_MSI_HASHTAB_SIZE];
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> @@ -862,9 +871,14 @@ static void set_gsi(KVMState *s, unsigned int gsi)
>      s->used_gsi_bitmap[gsi / 32] |= 1U << (gsi % 32);
>  }
>  
> +static void clear_gsi(KVMState *s, unsigned int gsi)
> +{
> +    s->used_gsi_bitmap[gsi / 32] &= ~(1U << (gsi % 32));
> +}
> +
>  static void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s)
>  {
> -    int gsi_count;
> +    int gsi_count, i;
>  
>      gsi_count = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING);
>      if (gsi_count > 0) {
> @@ -884,6 +898,10 @@ static void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s)
>      s->irq_routes = g_malloc0(sizeof(*s->irq_routes));
>      s->nr_allocated_irq_routes = 0;
>  
> +    for (i = 0; i < KVM_MSI_HASHTAB_SIZE; i++) {
> +        QTAILQ_INIT(&s->msi_hashtab[i]);
> +    }
> +
>      kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(s);
>  }
>  
> @@ -934,11 +952,130 @@ int kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(KVMState *s)
>      return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING, s->irq_routes);
>  }
>  
> +static void kvm_release_gsi(KVMState *s, int gsi)
> +{
> +    struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *e;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < s->irq_routes->nr; i++) {
> +        e = &s->irq_routes->entries[i];
> +        if (e->gsi == gsi) {
> +            s->irq_routes->nr--;
> +            *e = s->irq_routes->entries[s->irq_routes->nr];
> +        }
> +    }
> +    clear_gsi(s, gsi);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int kvm_hash_msi(uint32_t data)
> +{
> +    /* This is optimized for IA32 MSI layout. However, no other arch shall
> +     * repeat the mistake of not providing a direct MSI injection API. */
> +    return data & 0xff;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes(KVMState *s)
> +{
> +    KVMMSIRoute *route, *next;
> +    unsigned int hash;
> +
> +    for (hash = 0; hash < KVM_MSI_HASHTAB_SIZE; hash++) {
> +        QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(route, &s->msi_hashtab[hash], entry, next) {
> +            kvm_release_gsi(s, route->kroute.gsi);
> +            QTAILQ_REMOVE(&s->msi_hashtab[hash], route, entry);
> +            g_free(route);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_get_pseudo_gsi(KVMState *s)
> +{
> +    uint32_t *word = s->used_gsi_bitmap;
> +    int max_words = ALIGN(s->gsi_count, 32) / 32;
> +    int i, bit;
> +    bool retry = true;
> +
> +again:
> +    /* Return the lowest unused GSI in the bitmap */
> +    for (i = 0; i < max_words; i++) {
> +        bit = ffs(~word[i]);
> +        if (!bit) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +        return bit - 1 + i * 32;
> +    }
> +    if (retry) {
> +        retry = false;
> +        kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes(s);
> +        goto again;
> +    }

Guests with more MSI vectors than GSIs available, multiplexing are going
to be so slow that its best to disallow this completly (set_irq_route ->
synchronize_rcu can take 10ms or more, each).

MSI vectors must be allocated before use, can't it report #nr of
available ones in MSI Multiple Message Capable field? Or allow one MSI
per device? Or any other way to avoid this multiplexing.