qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qtest: add a fuzz test to fdc-test


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qtest: add a fuzz test to fdc-test
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 10:14:43 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1

Am 21.05.2012 10:11, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 21/05/2012 09:51, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>>>> GTESTER check-qtest-i386
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_unimplemented: unimplemented command 0x1f
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_unimplemented: unimplemented command 0xa8
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_unimplemented: unimplemented command 0x37
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_read_data: controller not ready for reading
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_unimplemented: unimplemented command 0x93
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_unimplemented: unimplemented command 0xe4
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_unimplemented: unimplemented command 0xc1
>>>> FLOPPY ERROR: fdctrl_unimplemented: unimplemented command 0x92
>>>>
>>>> Maybe they should be fixed first.
>> What do you mean by fixing? Turning them into DPRINTFs?
> 
> Or trace events?

Yeah, you could turn all FLOPPY_DPRINTFs into trace events. But the
point here is that today it's a FLOPPY_ERROR, and except for register
fuzzing they report real problems with the emulation and not just some
debugging information. So I'm not sure if hiding them is really a fix.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]