Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 v4] Allow machines to configure the QEMU_VERSION that's exposed via hardware

[Eric Blake]

On 05/23/2012 10:08 AM, Crístian Viana wrote:

>> So when you posted the previous version of your patch it was pointed
>> out that this is a buffer overflow:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-04/msg01657.html
>>
>> You need to fix this.
> 
> I have sent a reply to that thread explaining that the user actually
> doesn't have control of that string, that is only used internally in the
> code (just like the QEMU_VERSION macro).
> I fixed the code now with snprintf copying at most 12 chars to the
> string (the array size). I can't think of why pstrcat would be better in
> this case, as suggested by Erik.

s/Erik/Eric/, but you're not the first to make that typo.

pstrcat is more efficient than snprintf() - the former is dedicated to a
single task, while the latter has to parse a format string and decode
that it is doing a single %s expansion.  In other words, just because
*printf can do string concatenation doesn't make it the best tool for
the job.

-- 
Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature